nopenopenopeno

A lot of people seem to think changing the variable names makes it new code.

Be careful. You’re approaching communist thought crime.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Use_value

>The article doesn't need to make the presumption of innocence

Nor does the article have any business making the presumption of guilt, but it does exactly that.

I am criticizing what the article actually does, not expecting it to do something more.

All it takes is a person registering a name then receiving notification that others have registered the same name, then conflating that with evidence of guilt in the same exact manner the articles does.

If the article didn’t set such a good example of how to ruin an innocent person’s life, I wouldn’t be concerned.

It’s very simple. Person registers a name then receives notification that others have registered the same name, then conflates that with evidence of guilt in the same exact manner the articles does.

Correct. In the US, all working people serve and exist under authoritarian regimes as a matter of life or death.

The article’s claim is simply nonsense. As I quoted, the article literally says “they can discover if their abuser is a repeat offender” but in-fact they can only discover if any anonymous accusations have been registered.

>they can discover if their abuser is a repeat offender without identifying themselves to the authorities

Nonsense. An anonymous accusation is all but meaningless, and is in no way similar to a conviction. This is some truly garbage journalism.

This is commonplace for decentralized protocols. Torrents are probably the most obvious example.

The entire rust belt while you’re at it.

HN is US-based. Most people on HN are from the US.

All government entities in the US are ultimately controlled by private corporations.

In the US, we pretend to have a “democracy” when in fact a handful of competing and colluding corporations control everything. Is that any better?

>not enough laborers

Not enough wages. If the free market is good enough for everything else, why not for labor?

AI copyright drama is my favorite gossip these days because it can’t be reconciled until we accept that intelligence is created and held by societies, not individuals. Recent AI is a new way to exercise that intelligence, but it presents a major conflict with capitalism.

And what is measured is not what becomes law, hence why I don’t care. The fact is the laws are direct results of hard fought labor battles, not productivity data or theories.

I’m not taking any position on that. It’s irrelevant to my point.

>But everyone believes that 40 hours is the peak

False. The 40 hour work week in the US was won on the backs of a militant labor movement in the earlier 21st century. Plenty of bosses and company owners around the world believe more working hours would increase productivity, and laws around the world vary quite a bit too.

“In the 21st century, Karl Marx is probably the most famous critic of political economy, with his three volume magnum opus Capital: A Critique of Political Economy as one of his most famous books.”

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Critique_of_political_economy

That too!

The market is always downstream from politics. Karl Marx famously used the term political economy to reference both political and economic forces, because neither is coherent without the other.

>HSR fails cost/benefit analysis

It only fails the cost/profit analysis. The benefits are priceless when we consider the environmental impact.

Is there any evidence that it is enforced at all?

It sounds like you are either being dishonest or you haven’t actually thought about this.

IIRC Oracle is also in the process of opening new offices in Guadalajara, Mexico.

Equifax doesn’t care about that lol.

Where on earth does this number come from?

Bonuses that can be clawed back will never keep me around. I do generally appreciate my bosses, but I know better than to assume my hard work will be recognized. I work hard because I like being valuable. I stick around for a reliable income.

Also, I generally have low opinions of coworkers who do anything else. Those desperate for recognition usually sacrifice something else in the process.

Here’s the entire article:

The authors of this development say that the CO2 emissions were reduced by more than 85% compared to a regular unmodified diesel engine. Furthermore, hydrogen fuel recently became less expensive than diesel, which could mean that hybrid diesel-hydrogen engines could appear on the mass market, too.

“We have shown that we can take those existing diesel engines and convert them into cleaner engines that burn hydrogen fuel,” said Prof. Kook, one of the authors of the paper describing the results of this engineering study.

In order to make diesel engines run on hydrogen, the original fuel injection system remains in place. However, it is necessary to install an additional injector for hydrogen to deliver it directly into the cylinder.

The direct hydrogen injection must have the proper timing to achieve the best fuel mixture burning conditions, while also minimizing the residual emissions of toxic nitrogen oxide typical to all diesel engines.

Scientists say that they managed to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions below the levels of a regular diesel engine. The efficiency gains were also significant: in the diesel-hydrogen hybrid, the fuel efficiency was improved by more than 26%.

Clarks third law or whatever just reminds me of how “progress” is a religion in the liberal west. It’s not an observation but a declaration of some silly standards which are nonsensical to any mind not indoctrinated to the delusions of elite western liberalism. On top of that, it’s also outright pompous.