3,628 karma · joined January 21, 2009
//Edit: http://hackademix.net/2009/05/04/dear-adblock-plus-and-noscr... The reply by NoScript was excellent. I feel reassured.
Even the general "Lord, let your loving kindness be upon him; you came to us first, knowing we could not reach you on our own." seems more religious than consolatory, which bugged me as I got the impression from the note that religion was the facade his family and his abuser used to present themselves as good people and rationalise their inner demons.
In any case, I'm disturbed and outraged by the religious comments (ranging from wishing him well in the next phase of his life to saying how much God loves everyone even despite this to how he should forgive himself for the suicide). I thought respect was fundamental to religion.
Do all of the marketplaces really demand exclusive contracts?
I love the magnet like slopes - it's one that just makes you go "wow". Reminds me somewhat of the James Dyson "Wrong Garden" illusion as discussed previously on HN (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=779555, comments of thread discuss how to see a short video of it).
The "counter-intuitive illusory contours" one is interesting. It is almost as though our brain is treating the image as a liquid, and imagining distortion waves ahead of the "collision point".
The sine wave one is interesting in that you no longer notice the effect if you are reading the text below it (i.e not focusing on the wave beyond your periphery). This is somewhat similar to the "spinning dancer" illusion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spinning_Dancer) in which you can trick your mind to see the illusion in different ways, and sometimes have difficulty seeing it again as you did originally.
In my related searches, found this site: http://yloveillusions.com/en/category/uncategorized/page/5/ which has some other interesting illusions. Particularly like the "A bottle disappears" one.
Admittedly this is pretty intense, but so are treatments for cancer. Let's hope this leads to improved and safer treatments in the future.
Is it so that you can duplicate the original source with less duplication penalty?
See: http://www.stifflog.com/2006/10/16/stiff-asks-great-programm...