noitpmeder

At least the URL immediately calls out the fact the site is nothing but AI spew.

Imo it's not out of place in context if one is trying to determine if the candidate has an interest in finance.

Now, I'm not disqualifying them if they dont read the journal. But if they can't demonstrate any proactive interest in finance, or tell me about some happenings/events/stories they personally find interesting (theres a ton of interesting stuff happening) its definitely an amber flag.

I'm not sure I follow. In this instance we're talking about multiple backend matching engines... Correct? By definition they must be kept in sync, or at least have total omnipotent knowledge about the state of all other backend book states.

How to Speedrun devaluing the credentials your institution exists to award.

For your pet project? No. For something you're building for others to use? Almost certainly yes.

Off the cuff, id expect this leads to less improvement than you might think. The vast majority of orders, especially orders arriving in sequence close to one another, are likely on a small set of extremely liquid symbols, and usually all for prices at or near the top of the book for those symbols.

Happy to discuss more, might be off the mark... these optimizations are always very interesting in their theoretical vs actual perf impact.

Thanks for all the info!

I'm a front office engineer at a prop firm -- always interesting to get insight into how others do it.

We have fairly similar parallels, maybe with the exception of throwing new exchange connections to the dedicated networking group.

Always love watching their incident responses from afar (usually while getting impacted desks to put away the pitchforks). Great examples of crisis management, effectiveness and prioritization under pressure, ... All while being extremely pragmatic about actual vs perceived risk.

(I'm sure joining KCG in August of 2012 was a wild time...)

Curious what your actual role was -- sounds very interesting! Project manager? Dev? Operations specialist? E.g. were you hired into this role, and what were the requisites?

Obviously you're being facetious, that is not at all what that poster is claiming.

While I agree that entering a dark alley shouldn't result in ill effects, if ill effects happen in said dark alley it is still worth the discussion to remind people to stay out of dark alleys in today's day and age (or until the root problem, whatever it is, is improved).

Pretending that it is OK to enter dark alleys and forcing blame elsewhere will continue to have people unwittingly enter dark alleys.

But you see, when these rule were being framed bad actors PLANNED on exploiting the checkerboard to expand their effective control. (Or at least it seems so obvious of an issue that I have to imagine _someone_ was scheming along these lines).

Which venta are you referencing here?

That instantly kills the patient -- "But you asked me to remove his pain"

Just because they're better at writing CS algorithms doesn't mean they're taking steps closer to anything resembling AGI.

I'd say my expectation is papers should be minimal in their effect, and compounding. If your project proves new facts, either they should be clearly enumerable (with as much specificity as possible), or your project/presentation/paper should be broken up to the point your findings ARE enumerable.

The president isnt going to personally enrich himself and his cronies by _divesting_ power from his offce

Apparently popular enough to get him elected. It's not like his supporters were under any pretense who or what they were voting for

But it's not like AI did any of that...

I mean you can't fault them for that approach.

Obviously we would all like a full post mortem from the home dept side, but in today's litigious shareholder-value-driven world their response is the correct one.

Because defending civilians who Israel is targeting is, in today's world, considered antisemitic

How about we just stop socializing with Israel and its supporters while we're at it

Who the hell cares what garbage chatgpt vomited based on your unspecified chain of prompts?

I'd go one further and say all published papers should come with a clear list of "claimed truths", and one is only able to cite said paper if they are linking in to an explicit truth.

Then you can build a true hierarchy of citation dependencies, checked 'statically', and have better indications of impact if a fundamental truth is disproven, ...

You'll have to give some context. What did hella mean? How many months of your current spend rate do you have in the bank?

Not sure it's clear they will learn anything.... My impression was they were winning or settling these suits

Agreed. I'd love to have some of whatever copium the GP is smoking... Or be half as sure about many things as they are about this insane speculation.

What do you feel you cannot share concerns with your peers?

It is truly unfortunate for you that your actions have probably tainted your future open source contributions for a long time.

Economies of scale

I don't know about _squillions_, but numpy definitely has _requirements_, even if they're not represented as such in the python graph.

e.g.

  https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/main/.gitmodules (some source code requirements)
  https://github.com/numpy/numpy/tree/main/requirements (mostly build/ci/... requirements)
  ...