nnevatie

Yep, it is slop. I got 2-3 paragraphs in and closed the tab, as too many LLMisms raised their ugly heads.

Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.

This is the right shape!

I would rather read faulty English, succinct sentences and getting to the point, than the generic filler LLMs produce.

Yes, it’s basically business-as-usual but on speed.

Setting render scale to 1 definitely helped - the aliasing from the lines is gone.

The rest of the circular aliasing could likely be fixed by requesting MSAA, so e.g.:

renderer = new THREE.WebGLRenderer({ alpha: true, antialias: true, powerPreference: 'high-performance', })

The post is full of signs. Here's only a couple of examples:

> The method, the measurements, and what it costs us.

> That is the general shape of these wins.

> Parity is the gate, speed is the follow-up

I could go on and on, but you probably get the point. If you don't find anything funny with the above, you might have not been enough-exposed to slop.

Came here to say the same. Really tiring to read these slop-infested posts, where everything has the “right shape”.

> maintaining them

In the agentic era, there is no need for maintenance - each artifact is immutable and just-in-time. In case you need a new version, spin up a new artifact.

I’m only half-joking.

The naming of the library is pretty confusing, considering SDL_gpu is an official part of SDL3.

This is on Chrome/Win11:

https://snipboard.io/W8SXYm.jpg

> those people want to win an argument

Indeed - X, specifically, is infested with "Grok is this true?" -type discourse.

> https://blackhole.plav.in/

The lines in the demo look upscaled and aliased for some reason.

The ellipsoids are what a splat renderer uses as primitives, usually.

I'm curious to whether the recursively trained models degenerate to troglodytes after a couple of generations.

> “I don’t need the monitor anymore.”

Yeah, you just need a complicated setup of machinery that observes the room and multiple conventions on content tagging, etc.

Aka. I didn't like the N frameworks out there, so I invented 2 more. Now we have N+2...

Ok, that makes sense. I was commenting from a modern gamedev context.

No one, ever, uses centiseconds in this context.

It is a new brand of a “cool” FAD.

Hmm, not sure why "Weed Smoke Willie" would require any of that? It looked like an interesting game, though - I hadn't appreciated the idea of fishing shark with weed, before.

I used to be high-performance like you, then I took an arrow to the knee?

I get it. However, consuming data without consent is not well defined, when said data is publicly available on the internet. Licenses for code, and not abiding them are a different thing, I think. Most authors (of books) wouldn't credit their inspirations, unless specifically asked about them.

> distillation of stealing all of the world's current art

Here's the age-old dilemma, though - how is reading stealing?

> each NPC is voiced by AI and can respond to you in a convincingly human fashion

This is no longer fiction - see the latest AI update of PUBG.

Does BSSN still apply to the agentic era, though? Agents are compilers for ideas and architectural molding is kind of trivial at this point. So, one can start with an execution that works for the current state and complexify the implementation lazily if and as the need arises, later.

> SOTA LLMs locally

Shouldn't the headline be about running SOTA _local_ LLMs, as GLM 5.2 is nowhere near a SOTA LLM?

There's also plenty of us creating our own engines for the games we develop. Whether the mentioned games ever get finished is another topic...

If it's all for a hobby, creating your own engine is a lot of fun by itself.

Yes, the title seems off - I also thought I am going to be reading about the AI/pricing bubble.

> why zig and not one of the others?

I think one of the selling points is that the language does not come to your way and allows unsafe constructs. So, I think the target audience is roughly at C and C++ users.