Though I haven't used one; they'd be difficult to acquire in the West
2,650 karma · joined April 19, 2013
Though I haven't used one; they'd be difficult to acquire in the West
Anything else you'd recommend that isn't mentioned here yet?
In plain language it walks through what I wanted to know, in a modern and paranoid perspective, as a readable narrative, from the point of view that we want to design each of the basic crypto primitives ourselves.
[1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/97811187223...
But here's a 14" with as many ports as the VAIO, a 3:2 display, a hot-swappable second battery, and more: https://panasonic.jp/cns/pc/products/fv1f/
Ports: https://panasonic.jp/cns/pc/products/fv1f/spec.html#interfac...
(not generally for sale in the U.S. though; some truly innovative products are only in the East!)
Just sticky bits of cellophane that let you still see the lights when you need them but not so intense at night. You can get them on amazon or w/e
Another mentioned on HN recently is https://www.unlistedmobile.com/
These don't sound like complaints about anything the app itself lacks, they sound like complaints that it is successful at marketing.
Maybe I'm weird about it but reading the Bible for me is personal enough that I don't want to use an app that collects my identifier and tracks usage data. I'd rather pay for something I can use offline or anonymously. Non-profits seem preferable for this sort of thing as well imo.
I liked the old philosophy that a desktop should have "consistent look & feel". If all your apps use the same UI toolkit, that toolkit can be made to work well and with things like accessibility in mind, and can be themed/customized to the user's preference.
My old-hat way of thinking goes so far to say that "tabs" should be done by the window-manager, not the browser.
Why isn't that on all the time, even in normal browsing mode? Like, what breaks because of that? I thought cookies were locked per-domain since the invention of cookies.
I was thinking that nix would symlink /bin/A -> /nix/store/abcdef-A-1.0/bin/A, and also /usr/share/A.res -> /nix/store/abcdef-A-1.0/usr/share/A.res
So when I'm upgrading to A-1.1, maybe the /bin/A symlink would update a moment before the /usr/share/A.res symlink, which means invoking A at around the same time as the upgrade could pick up the wrong resource.
Do we just try to make sure that binaries know to look for resources relative to their binary-path? Or do we use chroot/containers? Sorry if this is a dumb question :)
Isn't there a race-condition here -- like if I invoke a program at the wrong time while it's in the process of changing symlinks, could it pick up the wrong libraries or something? Does Linux OS allow a "changeset" of files to be locked and altered together in a batch, or anything like that?
Actually I don't get what you're insinuating at all. Is anyone opposed to safety protocols?
My only suggestion would be to maybe put the name of the seller in the URL, that way you can see something about who you'd be paying before clicking the link. I'm not sure that helps any particular threat model but it would make me feel better about even navigating to the stripe link somehow.
The first thing that comes to mind for me is fraud. Most obviously, what guarantees are in place that when I go to one of these links, that the seller company is who they say they are? I assume Stripe audits their customers and, for example, reviews the seller logo that's displayed to make sure it isn't misleading. But also, does Stripe give the seller any analytics about who (or how often) people are going to their sales link, even if they don't make a purchase? thanks :)