ncgl

I love stuff like this, but I can't help but wonder much of this is simply editorialization on top of natural selection.

Do infected wolves really take more risks? Or are we just connecting two dots with a thin bro science understanding of evolution? It seems impossible to know when you're looking for a broad narrative that fits how genes are spread

I read this very skeptically.

When I hear eye tracking I immediately think of advertisers targeting me based on what I look at, NOT quadriplegics using Apple devices.

Maybe I'm a cynic

Great point

I just bought a few x79 boards for <reasons> and this would have helped me decide my options when plotting out the up front cost vs power savings.

Edit: I can't actually view the site at the moment, but my point is pcpartpicker doesn't have _everything_

The practice of rephrasing to get your word count up really irks me.

"Today, wolves, foxes, and snakes inhabit the cave, but it was once a popular spot for human pastoralists and their domesticated animals."

"Rather, they think it was a convenient spot for herders to stop and provide their flocks with shade and water."

"Even though humans didn’t have a permanent presence in the lava tube, the natural structure provided shelter for people and their herds for thousands of years"

As I read this article I started to feel embarrassed for the authors. It took so little work to make this.

Agreed, the original commenter was highlighting how difficult those decisions can be psychologically. I mean, you try to convince your spouse to sell the house and move into a cottage and see how it goes.

This is what property tax is, right?

I interpreted it as applying to 50 different roles, which I think is normal if you really like the company.

This is a funny comment - why'd you leave Firefox to have to come back to it?