nadagast

Have you tried Typescript? It's less ambitious/different than Clojurescript, but the compiler in watch mode compiles on change very quickly.

Do you think the 'existential danger from mobs with pitchforks' is justified? If they don't believe the outrage is justified, then they may be aware of this, but still speak these things out loud.

Interesting, I didn't know that--is it worth watching?

I don't think this is very true--what significant/majority of religious thought patterns are the same in atheism? The only one I think you could make a case for is ingroup/outgroup thinking, but that is not a majority of religious belief.

This attitude ignores the other 90+% of people who read your replies: people who aren't actually engaging, just reading and considering. I think the meme of 'debate online is pointless' is wrong because the vast majority of people who read anything you write publicly will be able to read from a position where they could have their mind changed, maybe. Write for those people.

Sounds like a fun challenge, but some of the comments here are a bit too hero-worship-y for me... He's a mere person.

It saddens me to see how much this (obviously terrible) idea has caught on in the general population. Science literacy should be a higher priority for our education system.

I'd love to see FPS rise in eSports again. Here's to hoping this new game has some advanced movement techniques (bhop!).