11,848 karma · joined December 8, 2014
Serial upvoter.
https://mrzool.cc
mrzool@mastodon.online
Berlin, DE / South Tyrol, IT
---
“Never use computers, computers are terrible, always avoid computers.” —Ethan Marcotte
“Incurious people terrify me.” —Coda Hale
---
[my public key: https://keybase.io/zool; my proof: https://keybase.io/zool/sigs/9JND0TW7QD9xj6as-iFm5IOq9QrLo8t1GfClmzGeL2I]
Would that be so terrible? I’m completely fine with having less software, if that means having better software.
> If you don't want Electron apps, don't use them. It's not like they would exist without Electron.
I don’t have a choice. I’m forced to use Teams for work. I need to restart my MacBook after every videocall.
I hope they get caught and prosecuted.
Things I love about it (from [2]):
> Miniflux is a minimalist software. The purpose of this application is to read feeds. Nothing else.
> The Miniflux layout is optimized to scan entries quickly.
> The design of Miniflux is inspired by Hacker News, Lobsters and Pinboard.
> Miniflux uses Javascript only where it’s necessary.
And the content extraction for truncated feeds, customizable with CSS selectors, is an absolute killer feature that I use heavily.
I'm very happy to pay an annual subscription fee and I haven't looked back once since I started using it. I'm eagerly waiting for NetNewsWire to add support for the Fever API[3] so that I can use it with Miniflux. But the web UI on mobile is good enough to be honest.
[1]: https://miniflux.app
[2]: https://miniflux.app/opinionated.html
[3]: https://github.com/Ranchero-Software/NetNewsWire/issues/76
I’m very skeptical but somehow intrigued.
https://drewdevault.com/2019/01/23/Why-I-use-old-hardware.ht...
> I think it's much, much more the other way around. Modern archaeologists have inherited their Victorian predecessors attitudes, who tended to look on primitive societies as backward and superstitious; "nasty, brutal and short".
Looks like you have an underlying prejudice against history and archeology practitioners, you already thought about these issues and you already have strong opinions on them. That explains your first comment. You might very well have your reasons in thinking this, but when you say
> I don't think there's much evidence to support this. Lots of speculation and interpretation, but not much actual evidence.
I'm sorry, but I really don't know what to tell you. Saying that there's "evidence" would be an understatement. Just pick up whatever history book. I suggest you read about pre-Colombian societies in central America, or shamanism in Africa, or even about religion wars in Europe in the 15th and 16th century. Just to get you started…
> What evidence is there for that? […] Why is there never any proof or evidence required for saying an artifact has a religious purpose?
From a related Wikipedia page:
It is assumed that the Golden Hats served as religious insignia for the deities or priests of a sun cult then widespread in Central Europe. Their use as head-gear is strongly supported by the fact that the three of four examples have a cap-like widening at the bottom of the cone, and that their openings are oval (not round), with diameters and shapes roughly equivalent to those of a human skull. The figural depiction of an object resembling a conical hat on a stone slab of the King's Grave at Kivik, Southern Sweden, strongly supports their association with religion and cult, as does the fact that the known examples appear to have been deposited (buried) carefully.
I'm sure you can find more precise details if you dig deep enough.
> Which sun-god?
You can read more about this cult here[1] and here[2].
> This is a calendar. It's proven to be a calendar. We know how it works as a calendar. It's a tool for predicting celestial events.
Do not project the hyper-rationalistic character of our current society to societies and civilizations of the pre-industrial era. People in the ancient times were not as rational and utilitarian as we are. Everything was permeated by religion, superstition and magic.
[1]: https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=...
[2]: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/wnja9z/scientists-reconst...
We have very different ways of seeing it. I would have found it absurd and infuriating.
The article closes with this surprising allegation without explaining anything about it. What did these books have to do with harassment, abuse, misogyny and MeToo? I'd be curios to know.
EDIT: Never mind, I've found what I wanted to know: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathy_Sierra#Harassment_and_wi...