65 karma · joined February 20, 2007
Note that to prevent doctors from working with only healthy patients, they'd be paid out for improvements in health rather than absolute health.
I know it may be tough for them to work with their competitors like this, but it's better then being squeezed by and independent operator.
1. Why exactly do they care? Isn't their job to enforce policy rather than create it?
2. Other than being a dominant opinion in the department, how does this actually affect net neutrality?
IIRC from freshman biology, these guys go into suspended animation when they dry out. I guess that's the post liquidity reference.
They got real performance gains when they decoupled the service provider from the infrastructure provider. Of course, this was implemented through regulation, but I wonder what you could do on an open market. Would it be feasible for consumers to buy into a local fiber network so that they "own" the last mile? That would give them leverage when selecting a provider for TV, Internet, and voice service.