I have a lot of respect for his work, but I can't really judge it's accuracy without diving more into the data.
1,219 karma · joined August 22, 2012
I have a lot of respect for his work, but I can't really judge it's accuracy without diving more into the data.
It's not just globally more efficient, usually each country benefits (although I wouldn't want to over commit by saying each country always benefits). But the gains from trade are often not distributed evenly within a country, for example manufacturing employees might lose their jobs while the owners have higher profit margins and/or consumers benefit from lower prices. Furthermore, diffuse gains such as lower prices are felt less than acute costs like losing a job.
Time and transition costs are also very important. In some cases transition costs may be very high, e.g. a whole generation of miners might not be able to transition to other types of work such as software development. In the long run the economy as a whole should benefit, but those miners are unlikely to be convinced.
The CPI is also unlikely to be able to capture hidden inflation, such as using cheaper ingredients in food to offset currency depreciation.
These are just off the top of my head. Calculating inflation is complicated.
Java, Rust & Ruby have built-in support for concurrency, but I haven't used those languages that much.
That's not to say corporations should not be taxed (although a coherent argument could be made for zero corporation tax), but certainly taxing corporations out of existence is a bad idea.
Even if you did have all of that data, you would still be missing a lot of data. For example, an important factor in economics is asymmetric information. An actor's decision may be optimal given the information available to them at the time even if the decision is suboptimal given perfect information. So for an even more accurate model, you would also need to have data on what each actor knows at any given point in time.
Furthermore, an actor probably does not have the ability to calculate the optimal outcome given the information available and there are innumerable subjective factors in economic decision making.
Big data will help you find some kind estimate, but it will not suddenly make economic modelling simple.
Nonetheless, many of these models are still falsifiable. For example, the textbook model of the benefits of trade due to comparative advantage only contains two countries and two goods. Although extremely simplistic, the theory does have falsifiable predictions and there is good empirical evidence supporting the broad theory. But this simple model will not be able to accurately predict how much a particular country will benefit from free trade.
In many cases what motivates a particular individual provides little insight into what happens in the economy as a whole. For example, a model of start-up success that included founder education level and sci-fi movies watched by founders would provide little, if any, greater insight than a model the model that looked at just education level. It's similar to over-fitting in machine learning – the extra parameter is probably harming the usefulness of the model by making it less general.
On the other hand, CEO cocaine addiction might be a very good predictor of company profits, but you would have a hard time getting accurate data for that regardless of how good your AI is. Furthermore, I could reasonably hypothesize that some CEO's would respond to cocaine by out-performing non-cocaine users while some would under-perform depending on physiological factors. Again, without massive invasions of privacy, economists will not be able to factor this into their models.
We are a small startup, based near Old Street in London, aiming to bring innovation to the home buying process. Beyond property listings we offer tools for financial decision-making and listings for professionals that home buyers might need, such as surveyors, mortgage brokers and architects.
We are growing and have some exciting projects coming up. We are about to launch a partnership with Zoopla and we are also working on a project with LendInvest, the world's largest peer-to-peer platform for real estate mortages.
We are looking for backend & devops developers who are comfortable with:
- Python (we are using Django)
- Postgres, ideally with some exposure to Postgis
- Elasticsearch
- AWS
- Bonus points for experience with Python data libraries such as NumPy, Pandas & scikit-learn.
For devops, we have experimented with Ansible & Docker, but haven't settled on anything yet.Get in touch even if you don't have experience in everything listed above, ultimately we are looking for good developers who are interested in learning and having a big impact in a small team.
If you are interested, please email jobs@plentific.com with your CV or have a look around https://plentific.com/jobs.
I found using BaconJS much nicer if I needed to transform data from asynchronous requests because you end up with a much more functional approach.
[0] http://blog.hertzen.com/post/102991359167/flux-inspired-reac...
The project involved asynchronous requests triggered by the actions, and transforming & aggregating the returned data. Compared to Reflux, Bacon made it very easy to do this by composing small functions that are applied sequentially to a stream of actions.
This blog post from the same author gives a bit more detail than the presentation slides: http://futurice.com/blog/reactive-mvc-and-the-virtual-dom
Looking forward to seeing the presentation video
In other languages I would probably prefer to follow the approach in the article.
To me it looks like a Debian swirl transformed to look like a brain.
Here is a PDF article by Stephen Few about pie charts: http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/08-21-07.pdf
I believe that just because someone is born with a disadvantage or have health issues does not mean they are defective. Everyone has as much a right to life as anyone else.
In support of your beliefs, I would be interested to know your responses to the following questions:
At what point does a person's suffering cause a sufficient decline in the global "average level of suffering" to imply they should not be allowed to reproduce or continue living? Should all sick people be left to die?
Should we serve the depressed arsenic instead of offering counselling and medication?
Should we just execute people of higher than average IQ, since ignorance is bliss?
We all have defects, should we all die to spare the planet?
How do you calculate average suffering? What is the unit of measure?
Does the momentary joy of seeing the birth of a child outweigh years of chronic pain?