I was unable to bring up the help modal box when pressing '?'. The only way to get to it was to use my mouse to press the question mark link at the top right.
This seems an odd place for this sort of feedback, but I saw no other avenue.
1,097 karma · joined June 16, 2008
Also, I organize Indy.rb (http://indyrb.org), run Indy Hackers (http://indyhackers.org), and write sometimes (http://mileszs.com).
I was unable to bring up the help modal box when pressing '?'. The only way to get to it was to use my mouse to press the question mark link at the top right.
This seems an odd place for this sort of feedback, but I saw no other avenue.
Sad, though, yes.
"This is so silly. Wait -- hand wavy -- that's right, nothing can be compared to Cassandra but pure love itself."
C'mon, man. That doesn't further discussion. That sort of statement serves only to incite anger.
That said, it is a nice article. It's just not new.
There's been a fairly large refactoring/re-architecting for Rails 3, including, unless I'm mistaken, avoiding alias_method_chain.
(I want to say that this whole pattern or ruby-ism is now being avoided in Rails proper, but that would only be hearsay based on something I think I read many months ago. ... Yehuda?)
Do you mean that you believe the seller colluded with the buyer in some way? Some other shady situation?
"Note however that it is a requirement of the Maps API Terms of Service that you use the Geocoding Web Service in conjunction with a Google map. This means that when it comes time to use cached geocoder results in an application, the application must display the results or any data derived from them on a map generated using one of the Google Maps APIs or Google Earth API."
I believe several non-U.S. carriers with iPhone users have it enabled already (on the iPhone), but I do not have first hand knowledge that this is true.
[1] I'm exaggerating for effect, of course.
I keep a list of links to things related to Vim, and the list of plugins I use is at the very bottom, if you're interested: http://mileszs.github.com/
I don't recall see this functionality in my one previous 'smart phone' (a Treo 650), but perhaps my memory has failed me.
You can find some here: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=site%3Anews.ycombin...
In particular, pg responds somewhere in this thread: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=100460). I might be carefully building a straw man here, as you are speaking to valid xhtml, not necessarily semantic xhtml. I hope you'll forgive me. I think the two topics are related, and that some of the arguments overlap.
The bottom line seems to be "Who cares? It works fine."
[1] A couple articles about running Tor on your Slicehost slice: http://www.tequilafish.com/2009/06/21/slicehost-setting-up-a... http://www.orient-lodge.com/node/3622
One tip that you should immediately be aware of is that you don't _have_ to run an exit node. You can force your relay to act only as an intermediary, in which case you almost certainly are not going to get any calls about abuse (because you won't exist in any server logs).
It was easy to cheat 8 years ago (from what I remember), it's surely easier to cheat now, and it's certainly not because this one kid stood up for something in which he believes.
find $1 -name $2 | xargs egrep -nC3 $3 | less
So, say: find ./ -name "*.rb" | xargs egrep -nC3 'gsub' | less
You'll get the matching line, three lines before and three lines after, as well as file name and line numbers.---
Is it possible to host my own copy of Tracker?
We do not offer a self-installed version of Tracker. However, a dedicated instance may be possible for organizations with a large number of users. Please email us at tracker@pivotallabs.com for details and pricing information.
---
I really, really like PT for agile or semi-agile or aspiring-agile teams.
I do agree that the 37s post seems contradictory in light of that.
Incidentally, another top 20 business program resides in northern Indiana at Notre Dame.
Also worth mentioning, before taking any applications, SproutBox developed a couple apps for themselves (http://sproutbox.com/sprouts).
http://devblog.rorcraft.com/2008/8/13/the-facebook-autocompl...
"A dyno is roughly equivalent to a Mongrel, except that
dynos are spread across multiple servers, so
performance in most cases is greater.
4 dynos are equivalent to the compute power of one
CPU-core on other systems."
A dyno is different from the common RAM+Bandwidth VPS slice, so it's difficult to make a comparison. (I'm going to do it anyway...) I would say that a 4 dyno machine, with everything else dialed down to the lowest value (so, free), you're roughly equivalent to Slicehost's 1024MB slice. (That's roughly $108/mo at Heroku, $70 at Slicehost.) You've got more storage space (so, the db can grow) on Slicehost, but you have to setup everything yourself, and adding power will take longer than a couple seconds.It should be stressed that Heroku makes everything really simple. You can save a lot of time and energy if you've got the money to get started with Heroku up front.
I like setting up and tweaking a VPS, though. I haven't seen any benchmarks to show that Heroku with 4 dynos performs as well or better than 4 mongrels, or Apache + mod_rails on the 1024 slice, etc.
I think it's a bit expensive, but, man, it's really cool, too.
The almost-a-cliche-easy example is Twitter: I have never been able to explain Twitter sufficiently to those who do not follow web tech closely. Suddenly, Oprah is banging out tweets in capital letters, and Shaq is correcting her 'netiquette. What happened?
I was only intending to comment that titling an article "Rails won" without qualification, or without clearly making a decisive argument, lacks substance, in my opinion. It's an anecdotal piece with which I sympathize, but that perhaps would have been better titled "Rails won again", which would elicit thoughts of Rails being chosen over other frameworks (and CMSs, in this case) in a particular project, as opposed to Rails winning some epic arms race.
I probably just should've kept the last line of that last comment to myself. :-)
The other difference is High-Assurance certs, which involve someone from (for example) GoDaddy calling your business-use land-line phone (which is required) and verifying some information, if I recall correctly.
Other than that, as far as I can tell, you're paying for the opportunity to put some silly seal on your site, bearing the name of whatever company of theoretically good repute, to make your users feel safe from the conniving, thieving, drooling hackers lurking behind each form button.
I do agree that it lacks substance.
You were right. They moved their 'Human Resource' application to the browser at some point, as well. See this article: http://www.osor.eu/news/fr-gendarmerie-saves-millions-with-o...