12,766 karma · joined February 11, 2019
I've been a programmer, and do have some actual Engineering education(Rose-Hulman, Purdue), but again, I'm not an engineer.
Odds are you aren't either. If you don't have a Professional Engineering License from your state, you're not an Engineer either, and you should stop claiming the title. It's stolen valor!
I'm currently deep into the territory of the crank or lone genius... more than likely I'm just a crank... but hey, I'm retired, and eccentric old man vibes suit me just fine. (I also look the part)
Socials: - bsky.app/profile/mikewarot.bsky.social - github.com/mikewarot - x.com/mikewarot
Interests: Hardware, Open Source, Programming, Research, Science, Technology, Writing, Travel
---
No person should ever have to blindly trust a computer program to do the right thing.
Blog: mikewarot.blogspot.com
I've been programming since 1979. I have made spur, helical, and bevel gears in a job shop setting. I have assembled computers from scratch, selecting clock generators, CPUs, logic gates etc.
I can fix ANYTHING given sufficient time and budget. I've repaired cesium beam atomic clocks, magnetic amplifiers, and an assortment of undocumented industrial control systems.
I've written programs that track equipment inspection, monitor the calibration of large water meters, and control the gluing of cardboard boxes, to name the interesting highlights... I did all of that before 2000.
I was a system administrator for 15 years, as time went on, less and less broke, and they eventually didn't need me.
I made gears for 5 years, bevel, spur, helical, splines, etc. Now I'd like to get back into programming. I did the Advent of Code in 2020, in Pascal... you can see the carnage on my github account: https://github.com/mikewarot/Advent_of_Code_in_Pascal
Currently working on getting BitGrid, a vision of bringing Petflops to the masses, brought into the real world using LLMs to help get past analysis paralysis.
email: chezmike at gmail
The customer asked "what happens if I disconnect this right now?" during the upload. It was a corner case I hadn't considered. It only took a few days to make it bulletproof.
---
The authors don't seem to consider the case of very slow or intermittent Internet.
I'd be worried about corruption in the download, and check for that. I'd also make very sure the watchdog hardware was on and the code respected it.
It seems to me you need 3 buffers for the OTA code, not 2. There should be a way to keep the last version that runs for X seconds in addition to any new updates, where X is quite large, perhaps a whole day.
38400 bits per second, 8 bits per character, no parity, 1 stop bit
If Ed Zitron is to be believed, Anthropic, and all the other LLM based tools companies are bleeding cash at one of the highest burn rates in history, subsidizing your tools, and likely giving them to you at around 5-10% of their costs. Even if you're prepared to pay 10x or more for the same thing, most aren't, and they don't have a sustainable future.
Your best bet is to develop a local capability on your own hardware while you've still got Claude to compare it to.
Second best is to have an LLM model and harness you can run in the cloud independent of Anthropic or any other AI company.
That would still leave the root cause of most of our problem un-addressed, ambient authority based Operating Systems are fundamentally insecure. Unfortunately, all of our systems share that architecture.
What's the most career altering *course of action* you've gone through?
I was an IT guy, and I took a job making gears in a job shop. The pay and commute were horrible, but it was immensely satisfying. Some of the gears I helped make will still be in service in a century.Then you need to make the actual service dead simple to use from anywhere. Punching through NAT and firewalls are the main issues there.
A capabilities based Operating System that could run Linux, Win32 and other OSs applications natively, replacing the system dialog boxes with power boxes.
An open data diode based on a pair of Raspberry Pi (without wireless of any kind, obviously) and a high-speed optocoupler.
A Streaming variant of SQL, so you could get a live view of any query that publishes updates
A variant of Lazarus, with much better documentation, and a new, magical equals in addition to all the existing code, like that from Metamine. You do the assignment, and it keeps the equality updated as the value on the left changes, like auto-recalc in a spreadsheet.
Air gap the supposed ASI, monitor/log it though a data diode, and you don't have to worry about egress of control.
However, you can, apparently, play the game in your browser here: https://www.myabandonware.com/game/super-solvers-spellbound-...
Other than having a summer intern once, it was a solo effort. The code was written in Turbo Pascal, with some code on the hand-held computers written in a language called PL/N. (A variant of PL/1 for the Norand corporation handhelds)
I wrote all my own text editing/forms handling libraries, and everything else I needed. Version control was using pkZip to archive the source code onto 3.5" floppy disks.
Tying it back to the article in question, I can't imagine what it's been like with the push for "sprints" and all the rest in software development over the past few decades. I can see how it would drive you to burnout. I'm very thankful I missed it.
Y'all have my sympathy.
I also miss keyboards, typing on glass really sucks.
First it takes the audio from your microphone. It then feeds it through a Hilbert transform to convert incoming audio into an IQ (complex) format. The advantage of an IQ signal format is that when you multiply it by another signal, the frequencies add or subtract, without getting extra image frequencies. This is why it's worth doing twice the computation in DSP work.
Then your audio is multiplied by a cosine wave with a frequency determined by a GUI slider, from -2000 to 2000 Hz.
This has the net effect of raising or lowering the pitch of your voice, like tuning in a single sideband transmission on ham radio.
To get the results out to the speakers, it samples only the real component to send to the audio output.
The net effect is it can raise or lower the frequency of your voice.
[1] https://gnuradioworld.com/#fg=H4sIAAAAAAAACsVXS2_bOBC--1fMTR...
This would lead to a much, much smaller "total addressable market", rendering the massive AI build out into a rapidly depreciating asset that can't even be operated without a loss.
Even if the hardware was effectively free following a market crash, and bankruptcy sale, the power required to run it might be more expensive than the compute it generates is worth.
At which point, unlike dark fiber after the .com crash, all the hardware becomes scrap metal.
Now factor in the macro picture, in which this AI bubble is holding up the stock market, and by proxy, the US economy. I think we're in for Global Depression II, worse than 1929.
Because we can't run our own servers without substantial risks, almost everyone is forced into the walled gardens where network effects make it feasible to economically run the servers, and the administrative staff to keep them running, and somewhat secure. This provides the honeypot that then draws in advertisement and all the ills that go with it, as we're not the customers, we're the product.
I would hope that we can collectively get our security act together, which will as a byproduct make it easy for everyone to run their own servers without risk. But that's always been 20 years off, like fusion power. Everyone seems to think that Linux is good enough, which it isn't, but here we are. 8(
The only verifiable invariants that are going to work in the long run are:
air gaps
data diodes
Interposing relays used to be used with PLCs[1] to prevent motor control systems from energizing both forward and reverse power to a large motor in the unlikely but possible event of control systems failure. We need to apply the same amount of engineering rigor to our computer systems.We simply shouldn't trust software to a job that belongs in hardware.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmable_logic_controller
The focus seems to be more of the same failed strategy:
a shift to "safe" programming languages
a focus on patching known bugs proactively
ratcheting up rules and enforcement
This all amounts to "try harder", which isn't going to work. We need a ground up restructuring of everything if we want to have a stable foundation upon which to keep society going.If you run critical infrastructure, it must be air-gapped from the internet. If you need to monitor said infrastructure, there are data diodes which can be configured to allow the egress of monitoring data, with ZERO risk of allowing ingress of control, enforced by the laws of physics, not some code running on hardware that might not be perfect.
We need to channel everything important through clearly defined, and well monitored channels.
Ambient authority based operating systems were a great hack, but we need to leave them behind. Proven microkernel based OSs with everything running in userland, and all access provided using capabilities, with UI including powerboxes, are a bare minimum.
The amount of code and hardware we actually trust should be pushed towards zero as far as is possible. Linux, Windows, etc are all unfit for the present and future security needs of humanity.
As for AI/LLMs themselves. They're natively a huge amount of floating point math that results in token predictions. The code that runs the math is something we can control. There's no reason to give code access to anything about the machine it's actually running on. This should be something that can be enforced without extraordinary effort.
First, Ronald Reagan's adviser Lee Atwater[1], advocated for the use of wedge issues, such as the mythical "Welfare Queen"[2], to erode support for the social safety net. Reagan's FCC commission decided end the Fairness Doctrine[3], which helped maintain the public consensus in the mainstream. In my strong opinion, it was a huge mistake, along with Trickle down economics. However, considering the traitorous nature of Reagan's administration[4,5], I guess it's to be expected.
Hillary and Bill Clinton went along with things, and came up with the strategy of "Triangulation"[6], in which they used wedge issues as a way of staking out a political position, without actually needing to care for their base. This resulted in a wave of virtue signaling[7] and political correctness[8], and an end to actual support of the social safety net. Examples of this include "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" as official policy in the US Military.[9]
When Hillary Clinton and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz rigged the 2016 Democratic Primary[10], they shunted the backlash against all of this that Bernie Sanders was channeling, and gave us Donald Trump, who is a master of exploiting it.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Atwater
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welfare_queen
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_doctrine#Revocation
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_October_Surprise_theory
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation_(politics)
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue_signalling
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness
[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_ask,_don%27t_tell
[10] https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-b...
Here on HN, I've noticed that I pro-actively defend myself against things I think will be said in counter to my comments. I concluded it's being trained into me.
Alternatively, I've been banging on against the same things that I see as insane so long that I know all the objections.
It's not rocket surgery!
Even if every single Republican got voted out, the rot is still there, just wearing the other hat.
I'll report back if we ever get it actually working properly.
The money that funded those got sucked up by ad-tech companies like Google and Facebook.
Blogging, was a low to non-profit version of the same thing. You'd direct your RSS reader to your favorite feeds, read what your "friends" wrote, and reply in the comments, etc.
The thing that happened was the audience shifted from technical people happy to deal with RSS readers, and do the work of maintaining subscriptions found the process of getting a blog going to be burdensome, and moved into the easier walled gardens.
The effort of blogging to a stand alone platform wasn't horrible, nor was writing and editing something long enough to be worth the time and consideration of the reader. To make it worth it for a blogger though, you need an audience, and the feedback cycle was slow, through Google for anyone not using an RSS reader. It was really hard to get attention enough to feel the effort was worth it.
The social networks arrived, and they offered faster feedback, and more of it, with a single mechanism to handle replies, instead of each platform having a different system, and anti-spam mechanism. When Robert Scoble gave up on blogging, that signaled the end of it for me.
A technical blog is a teaching tool, and nobody is willing to pay the teachers enough in money, or attention, to make it worth it.
One area that has bloomed though, because that's where the incentives moved, is video blogging. Here are some YouTube channels that might be interesting to you:
https://www.youtube.com/@HuygensOptics -- if you want to learn about optics
https://www.youtube.com/@EEVblog -- an opinionated Australian with one of the oldest EE focused channels
https://www.youtube.com/@CuriousMarc -- deep technical/repair videos
https://www.youtube.com/@ThinkingandTinkering -- alas, Robert Murray-Smith is no longer with us, he had many interesting things to say
https://www.youtube.com/@ThisOldTony -- Machining videos with a sense of humor
https://www.youtube.com/@smartereveryday -- an engineer who used to field test missiles learns new things all the time
https://www.youtube.com/@Blondihacks -- Canadian machinist who teaches along the way doing projects
https://www.youtube.com/@TheAmpHour -- an audio blog about electronics design
https://www.youtube.com/@Computerphile -- various topics related to computers with staff mostly from the University of Nottingham
https://www.youtube.com/@primitivetechnology9550 -- John Plant teaches by showing, how to build the most basic technology ever, he started with a rock and a stick, and worked his way up from there. Turn on subtitles, he doesn't talk, he annotates on screen, it's wonderfully quiet
https://www.youtube.com/@OCPTAP -- if you're a time nut, this is the channel for you, it's about very, very precise timing
https://www.youtube.com/@NileRed -- crazy and almost safe chemistry experiments
https://www.youtube.com/@urituchmanpigeon -- an eclectic approach to building things
https://www.youtube.com/@CaseyJones-Engineer -- an actual engineer who picks apart various things gone wrong with various current events.
https://www.youtube.com/@mrpete222 -- Mr Pete, retired shop teacher with an attitude, and a lot of things to show you how to do.
https://www.youtube.com/@PracticalEngineeringChannel -- Grady, another actual engineer, shows how infrastructure works, with practical demonstrations built in his garage, and some on-site things as well
https://www.youtube.com/@DavesGarage -- Dave Plummer, the guy who wrote task manager, and the zip file handler for Windows, talks about various things computer related
https://www.youtube.com/@AnastasiInTech -- A chip designer talks about the latest trends in chip fabrication
https://www.youtube.com/@JeffGeerling -- Things related to radio broadcasting, raspberry pi, mini-racks, gps timing, etc. His dad is a broadcast engineer.
https://www.youtube.com/@RealEngineering -- What it says on the time, breakdowns of how things actually work
https://www.youtube.com/@wgowshipping -- Sal Mercogliano, an actual mariner and Professor, discusses current events in shipping on the high seas.
https://www.youtube.com/@MentourNow -- A pilot discusses current aviation events
https://www.youtube.com/@NDC -- NDC Conferences - Interesting programming talks
https://www.youtube.com/@ZackFreedman -- Wild and crazy, the inventor of GridFinity
https://www.youtube.com/@voiceofthunder9620 -- An actual scientist, a chemist, who really, really despises Elon Musk, and sometimes plays with NaK, a liquid metal at room temperature. He might be the one who gives us a work-around for global warming
https://www.youtube.com/@NoEngineerHere -- Interesting projects, but NOT an engineer
https://www.youtube.com/@StefanGotteswinter -- a proper German doing machining projects
https://www.youtube.com/@dgelbart - Dan invented the first practical stepper, which gets used in the manufacturing of every chip ever. You really should watch his "how to make things" tutorial
https://www.youtube.com/@3blue1brown -- Grant Sanderson talks about Math, beautifully illustrated and story-told
https://www.youtube.com/@Kathy_Loves_Physics -- The real history of how physics got to where it is
https://www.youtube.com/@oxtoolco -- Recently retired from Berkeley's University machine shop, lots of practical tips related to machining very precisely
https://www.youtube.com/@TITANSofCNC -- CNC manufacturing, they offer free education in the trade
https://www.youtube.com/@Clough42 -- Machining and CNC related projects
https://www.youtube.com/@arduinoversusevil2025 -- Arduino vs Evil, an opinionated Canadian who swears a bit does various things related to machining, with a lot of tear downs of tools.
https://www.youtube.com/@WardCarroll -- Former Navy Aviator talks about current events, sometimes with Sal from What's up with Shipping (see above)
https://www.youtube.com/@tested -- Adam Savage, of Mythbusters does various builds
https://www.youtube.com/@w2aew -- Radio theory and projects
https://www.youtube.com/@AppliedScience -- Some of the coolest science projects, including things like spin coating, supercritical CO2, etc.
https://www.youtube.com/@RexKrueger -- Traditional Woodworking
https://www.youtube.com/@DylanBeattie -- Dylan is great at breaking down things that you think are simple... like "Plain Text" formatting
https://www.youtube.com/@ShakeTheFuture -- Melting metal in a microwave, so you can do home casting
https://www.youtube.com/@joepie221 -- A machinist in Austin Texas, with a lot to teach
https://www.youtube.com/@KevlinHenney -- Talks about programming
https://www.youtube.com/@GOTO- -- GOTO Conferences, programming talks
https://www.youtube.com/@essentialcraftsman -- Practical construction and blacksmithing
My friend Jim's been soldering since the 1950s. We solder a lot of things with leads, for this, his method is to get each item to be joined tinned, then use solder as a mechanical joint. Melt in the solder, remove the iron but hold them together, then once cool, tug on the joint to make sure it holds.