70 karma · joined October 31, 2012
Having this presented as an April fool's gag rustles my jimmies in an odd fashion.
While I would be excited to see such enthusiasm relating to a government property, this doesn't smell kosher.
Especially as I move often, I really enjoy having the ability to stop promotional mail from the previous tenants.
If the executives aren't aware of these facts, then it's a communication error. If they are ignoring the facts then there's little chance they would entertain a push for autonomy.
> ... You'll just end up job hopping in the search for something incredibly rare. Better is to assume that most executives are harmful and minimize your career exposure to their incompetence and malice.
Blame flows downhill, my friend. By accepting autonomy you're opening yourself to the risk of those actions. It's quite the opposite to minimization.
Conceptually, I like your ideas. Empowering smart people is rarely a bad decision. But attempting to change from within an existing behemoth, with their entrenched positions, is a far-fetched dream.
I disagree. The self-motivated path may be "more productive" for that one person, but it does nothing to guarantee returns or value for the larger organization.
Any employee should leave a company if they believe that their executive team is consistently shown to be inept.
If autonomy is the end-goal, start a company or go freelance.
Don't sabotage the larger vision for short-term gratification.
If I were a gambler, my money would be on an infrastructure/man-in-the-middle or social-engineering attack vector. The people are likely stressed and the code is admittedly troublesome.
Godspeed.
Could you elaborate on this, please?
No one in their right mind plays this game.