michaelgiba

I’m concerned why chardet is on that list haha

Blockchain is totally trustless. All you have to do is trust the source code maintainers, inventor, anonymous miners and hackers reading your smart contract code all at once. After that it’s 100% trustless.

The fact a centralized system profits from engagement isn’t inherent to the fact it’s centralized, decentralized platforms are likely to do the same. As for your second point that their mistakes happen at scale, that is true. But also the things they do right happen at scale as well. All of the automated moderating and disinformation detection that has been in the works happens at scale too. It would be much harder to do similar in a decentralized system because of the partitioning of user data.

+1, same founder tho

I also don’t agree with this and might even argue the opposite. Nevertheless, I think in general de/centralization is orthogonal to censoring inflammatory actors. That always comes back to who are the moderators and what are their stances on censorship.

Wow, I hadn't heard of this. That was great

I gotta say, the Yale School of Music website is pretty cool on its own

Maybe I’m missing it, but why is this trending now? The EO was in November

I respectfully disagree with this. Assuming you have the right build system and tooling setup a monorepo is strictly better than the alternatives solely from the code reuse and cross-stack visibility gains you get.

I’m just surprised a single RabbitMQ node powered all of door dash for as long as it did

Why is this downvoted? This has been happening a lot recently on seemingly normal messages.

> If there was a government cover-up and people were still getting sick then we wouldn't see people putting themselves at risk to go to a music festival.

A tad misleading, if people cannot communicate publicly about people getting sick or hear this from media, why wouldn't they go to a music festival? They wouldn't know. Interested to hear your thoughts

I'm honestly pretty disappointed in the BBC for covering this like it is fact and not calling into question the data integrity issues China is infamous for. Nevertheless, I do think China, at least before re-opening, had less community spread than most other countries due to the severity of their lock-down. Authoritarian countries are able to impose measures like this much more quickly than democracies, for better or for worse.

Thankfully you don't need to go through the president to get this information. Troves of independent, even international, journalists have written stories on COVID responses within US states, including TX and FL. It is wholly misleading to compare the claims of these two countries.

I’m confused too, this seemed like a normal comment

I’ve always thought Redhat’s pattern fly does the best job of this corporate look. https://www.patternfly.org/v4/

My company made some of our progress in the self-driving space public - thought I would share in case anyone finds it interesting. (We are hiring)

FYI post was removed by mods

I read this headline as "Making Prison Communication-Free" and thought it was some sort of cruel experiment

Amazon did the same thing to MongoDB by replicating their API and as far as I know there hasn’t been any successful litigation on Mongos behalf

Not to mention everyone in the show has a British accent, even Gorbachev. Hilarious

Great point

Gates 2020

I would even go as far as saying this would be mandating expertise. The zero days these state actors use often fly under the radar for a while. I don’t think you can really blame the companies

this is amazing

Wow.. thanks for putting this in perspective

Judging from the other comments I guess I’m in the vast minority, but I think the fine structure is really bad for small businesses. I’m not a GDPR fan.

I use it daily and it’s actually pretty nice. Personally the they don’t bother me when they are “littered” on the sidewalk either

I see, thanks!

“About two out of every three inhabitants are co-op members, together producing around 30 percent of the region’s GDP.” - does this mean the 1/3 that isn’t a part of the co-op accounts for 70% of the GDP? Could someone clarify?