metaltyphoon

It is Java as C# disallow this

Read that and what part of that can’t be done in Rust in 2025?

> managing lifetimes

If you are not using a GC language, you WILL be managing lifetimes. Rust just makes it explicit, when the compiler can’t prove it’s safe, which Zig, C don't really care.

> I know that Zig doesn't allow attaching data to error for good reasons. If error data contains interior pointer then it causes memory safety problem

IMO this is not a good reason at all.

> python syntax

I don't mind but many do so I don't see this as a plus.

The allocator’s output is only two: either you get memory or you don’t. To quote GP

> Every function with an IO interface cannot be reasoned about locally because of unexpected interactions with the io parameter input

This means with IO interface is not quiet clear what WILL happen so it “depends”

> the idiom would be to shadow intermediate variables often

There is no idiom about this. Do it if you like but clipply doesn't warn about any of it.

Such as? Any links to this?

I don't think so because the result of calling an allocator is either you got memory or you don’t, while the IO here will be “it depends”

> Weird claim since threads were originally introduced as a concurrency primitive

Wasn't this only true when CPUs were single core only? Only when multi core CPUs came, true parallelism could happen (outside of using multiple CPUs)

I always thought they had auto-injectors

Only now at Costco. It used to be much higher

Executables lives in pages of RAM and not all pages are in physical memory at once.

Soon https://github.com/microsoft/winget-pkgs/pull/303728

The testing suite is not open, which is one of the most important part of the project.

These are all opinions.

No, but as morbid as this sounds, the three(?) devs one day will pass away so now what?

> I think zig generally composes better than rust.

I read your response 3 times and I truly don't know what you mean. Mind explaining with a simple example?

The moment turso becomes stable , SQLite will inevitably fade away with time if they don’t rethink how contributions should be taken. I honestly believe the Linux philosophy of software development will be what catapults turso forward.

> Zig gives the programmer more control than Rust

More control over what exactly? Allocations? There is nothing Zig can do that Rust can’t.

I wish C# would add this too. I despise having to write docs in XML style

This is nuts lol

Thank you for an actual answer.

Does this open the possibility for easier cross compilation to macOS?

I've been building a shared lib for both Android and iOS/iPadOS and using jni and jin_fn crate in Rust has been a God sent. Using cargo-ndk simplifies the building process so much.

I don't really do front end work so C# with NeoVim is working great for me for the last year.

Because a 60 majority is needed. They have the majority but not 60 so they have to compromise somewhere to get the necessary votes.

IMO a language made mainstream when Azure, AWS and GCP has sdks for it. It’s not fool proof but and its a perhaps a good indicator?

If I were to ask you, how many APIs do you think “core” (w/e you consider core) does Java have. Think of a number before opening the link below and then let me know what you had in mind.

https://apisof.net/

Old but amazing good small series.

https://youtu.be/07Q9oqNLXB4?si=FthNcZSYQSNnT0mP