5,252 karma · joined January 27, 2010
The Jurassic had 5 times more CO2 than today. [1]
Modern climate change is slower than the K-T mass extinction event, when photosynthesis was halted. [2]
[1] https://www.livescience.com/44330-jurassic-dinosaur-carbon-d...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous–Paleogene_extinctio...
The oil is gone, but coal is still easy to access. We can bootstrap off a second coal industrial revolution. And every person who've been through high school knows the principles involved in generating power from coal, though might be lacking in the actual techniques.
> but only to sell, not to use
You've proved there's buyers who would find a use for it.
“Rich countries” are time poor that’s why they produce time related articles like these. :)
What does your FYI line mean - very cryptic.
The same applies for software engineers. The method of using the common tools is identical across many web applications - the creativity is in which of these tools, for which set of subtasks are selected for this set of requirements.
It doesn't need to be said that she is in the wrong, there's no excuse, no defence that can be offered - but I said it anyway in case you misunderstand me in my next statement:
Tech companies and employees and the people who use their products live in the same world. Even if there is no legal or financial responsibility between ourselves and others, it doesn't mean we can forget about the fact that we all live on the same planet. Whenever we are thinking about making a change in the code, we have a responsibility to be empathetic and also think about its effects on other members of the same society we all belong to.
Her videos seemed quite harmless - home exercise, veganism, animals.
I don't understand the motive for YouTube to take down her remaining videos.
In the early stage of the information revolution, it was fashionable to
argue that new technologies would eliminate distance. People could do
creative work in rural Colorado and communicate their ideas anywhere on
earth with the flick of a finger.
I think that effect is true to a limited extent. People could do creative work in countries such as Vietnam, India, Thailand and communicate their ideas to anywhere on Earth;The equalisation of Geography didn't apply between rural vs urban. It applied between developed and developing countries.
I can speculate several reasons why, but without deep enough research or sources I'll leave them as an exercise for the reader. (https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=bsder is an interesting comment)