Surely that sort of basic communication about what you're doing should be one of the first things you learn...
126 karma · joined October 4, 2011
Surely that sort of basic communication about what you're doing should be one of the first things you learn...
Once again HN and techies in general are a ridiculously small percentage of the population. Normal people do not see things the same way.
In any event, it's as likely as seeing people riding segways all over the place.
Most traffic in the US is caused by the lack of roundabouts.
I've always been a hacker, tweaker etc. But I can't imagine how anything would work without advertising. And it's not something I find annoying or have trouble filtering out. It's like if you're walking down a street, and you see all the shop signs... If you're not interested, just keep walking.
Still, it's not really a cause I value.
About 65% of HN use an adblocker. The general online population, only about 1% use an adblocker.
HN is heavily heavily biased away from advertising. HN also mistakenly probably thinks it's because they're "early adopters" or more "technical". The truth is more like HN is in a bubble, anti-mainstream etc. If you did a poll on here to find out how many people watched American Idol, you'd probably find similar results - but that wouldn't mean HNers were 'ahead of the curve', it'd just mean HNers aren't "mainstream".
Get out of your bubble HN. Do what your potential users do - view ads. Maybe even buy a TV as well!
Ads generate $billions online. They work.
1% of the online population block ads. It's not really a problem outside places like HN where the majority detest ads.
Judging from the results here so far, it's pretty clear that a large amount of HNers are in that minority.
Maybe scanning books in or archiving live concerts or saving some geocities pages is something you're interested in, but I'm skeptical it's really preserving history for the good of mankind.
I personally don't see the need for mint.
But it's not for example saving lives. So personally, I think there are far more deserving charities in need of donations.
There's people dying out there...
Walk down a city street. It's full of adverts for shops you might want to go in.
Often in terms of websites that exist on the internet.
Rarely in terms of ones that are mentioned on hackernews.
"Free website" often means "hugely profitable website"
Why is it a problem? So they show me a few adverts... big whoop. I can just ignore them.
The issue is, the vast majority of people will never pay for access to online websites/apps (Me included). If you restrict yourself to the business model "charge users", then you've just got rid of 99% of the online population.
Advertising means that everyone gets what they want (Apart from the very very small but overly vocal minority that don't like adverts or have privacy concerns).
Using google to search doesn't make me a "product". They just happen to be able to make a ton of money showing adverts, which are useful for me also.
Ignore advertising revenue at your own cost.
But OTOH, this is hackernews, so continue hating advertising lead business models as usual...