3,405 karma · joined March 18, 2012
Azure makes money, 50% of Windows computers are basically free and need to get you to sign up for a subscription some how. The other 50% are Windows Pro/Enterprise, but MS assumes they'll get that money forever so doesn't put any resources into that. In 10 years the kids switching to Linux on desktop today will be in charge of the business deals and switch corporations to linux because they're not scared of it like the current business IT leaders
All you really need is "drive slower if you can't see (because rain, fog, or degraded cameras), or you're in an area where children might run out into the road"
Why will they never be safe?
Also can you define safe?
Side effects include: reduced pollution, and cheaper ways to clean up pollution
ODBC Data Source Administrator (64-bit)
Configure > untick "Use Current Directory", Select Directory
There's probably more people paying to hunt humans in warzones https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3epygq5272o
1. Assume printing press exists 2. Now there's no need for a teacher to stand up and deliver information by talking to a class for 60 mins 3. Therefore students can read at home (or watch prepared videos) and test their learning in class where there's experts to support them 4. Given we only need 1 copy of the book/video/interactive demo, we can spend wayyyyy more money making it the best it can possibly be
What's sad is it's 500 years later and education has barely changed
Tests were created to save money, more students per teacher, we're just going back to the older, actually useful, method of talking to people to see if they understand what they've been taught.
You weren't asked to write an essay because someone wanted to read your essay, only to intuit that you've understood something
In USA K-12 education costs about $300k
350 million people, want to get 175 million of them better educated, but we've already spent $52 trillion dollars on educating them so far
Seems the conclusions are: fewer people is better; only one "organisation" or group should contribute to the code; ownership should be at the lowest level possible, not a high up manager; and knowledge retention is important, effectively manage people leaving and make sure the design rational is well documented