1,066 karma · joined April 19, 2016
Side Projects: https://AdSentence.io https://CoWriteStory.com
If you have an interesting stack that I do not know, I am willing to learn with a huge discount.
b.pourtaherian at google email dot com
People, please vote for medicare for all candidates, it might not affect your life now, but you don't know what the future holds for you.
If a politician influenced by a lobbyist start to question the decision of an agency, have hearings, grill the management on the reasons they decided to waste tax payers money, etc. that is not fun for those employees.
There is no incentive for that trouble and people try to avoid it as much as possible.
https://www.ftb.ca.gov/file/ways-to-file/online/calfile/inde...
I am pushing so hard to make it better and more useful to more people, like being able to add capital gain that is not currently supported.
these are the push backs that I am getting:
1. Last time they tried to do what all of you ask, a ready return. TurboTax and others hired bunch of lobbyist and put so much pressure on people here and killed the project. People are still afraid and don't want to do too much to grab the attention of their lobbyist!
2. Use of CalFile goes down every year and if trend continues, it would be killed in the near future.
when you have your Federal return it is much easier to pay a little more and file your state tax with it too. No body even knows CalFile exist because we don't have a marketing budget to promote it.
3. Even people here buy the argument that free software exist and people could file their taxes for free.
It is more like they think they are better than us, and "but really they think they are better than us".
This studies are not even about the super-rich, people with like $50k cars are showing less consideration toward people that they fell are poorer.
Capitalism doesn't work for everything!
if you bet on an event with 50% chance of earning $1 or 0. your bet is worth $0.50
you need the bet to worth $0, and that is only possible by making CEOs financially liable, and that would never happen, nor is realistic, a CEO's decision could cost company billions.
so by this analogy the riskier the CEO's actions the outcome is greater for them.
if the bet pays off, they win big, if it doesn't the shareholders lose.
that is not a good thing, out of 2 monkeys throwing darts one of them will make money.
They could get both sides votes, increase the price of houses and claim to do something for affordability without actually attacking the problem of supply and demand.