27,351 karma · joined January 17, 2014
Although I really like open source ideas, the humane, social and altruistic principles of free software are very beautiful. Reading this bug report a long time ago certainly influenced me on the software I choose to use.
I love the simplicity of the C programming language although I admit it is far from the most adequate tool for most of what I do.
https://hnbadges.netlify.app/?user=marcodiego
Hope security issues with it are solved and usage becomes mostly transparent through userspace libs, it looks like a high performance strategy for our current computing hardware.
Embraer engineers are clearly doing something right.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gol_Transportes_A%C3%A9reos_Fl... [2] https://aerossurance.com/safety-management/erj190-p4kcj-main...
Since any circuit can be built using only NAND's, this computer can simulate any circuit, including the circuit of a Turing complete CPU. It certainly would be very slow, but relatively simple to build. I still have to think about a good type of memory for this machine. Maybe one day I'll take the courage to build it.
Ok, that maybe part of how 'WE' define life, but, for me, that looks a lot like an arbitrary definition.
Impressively, it worked. It was slow to spit out tokens, at a rate around a word each 1 to 5 seconds and it was able to correctly answer "What was the biggest planet in the solar system", but it quickly hallucinated talking about moons that it called "Jupterians", while I expected it to talk about Galilean Moons.
Nevertheless, LLM's really impressed me and as soon as I get my hands on better hardware I'll try to run other bigger models locally in the hope that I'll finally have a personal "oracle" able to quickly answers most questions I throw at it and help me writing code and other fun things. Of course, I'll have to check its answers before using them, but current state seems impressive enough for me, specially QwQ.
Is Any one running smaller experiments and can talk about your results? Is it already possible to have something like an open source co-pilot running locally?
At the time I considered those developers were right and didn't complain. It made more careful before sending patches and commenting. But it also affected my willing to contribute with the project. I also consider that, although those devs were right, they could have expressed themselves more cordially. I don't think being that rude improves anything.
I do support the CoC committee decision and hope more projects had one.
The answer was "nothing". I asked why; the answers was: "no Photoshop user will migrate for Linux because of it, no gimp user will migrate to Photoshop".
Also, I've read in HN once: that are more people using Linux on the desktop than there are Photoshop users. People overestimate photoshop as a killer app.
Ok, he no longer works there, but I'm sure he still benefits from it.
I can only hope it 'infects' other languages.
Now, just imagine... just imagine how much performance could be gained if game vendors didn't ignore it.
1 - cups-browsed is able to install printers automatically (without the requirement of user confirmation) by listening to UDP packets on port 631.
2 - Attacker uses this "feature" to install a fake printer with a custom driver (which is also installed without user confirmation and can be downloaded from an arbitrary host) which specifies the "command to run" when a print job is sent.
3 - User prints something in the fake printer and the "command to run" is executed.Well.. actually, it doesn't needs to be slow.
That would make it not only faster but also safer.