manderley

Good program, but that website is really hard to read.

You were the one disputing the claim, it's on you to bring the actual data. So no, you can't pass the buck.

The housing crisis is perpetuated by a lack of coherent planning. It's also why transit is suboptimal. It definitely doesn't help that it isn't one big city, it's actively detrimental.

You're linking an article lacking in data.

I can find the full opening ceremony on Youtube, uploaded by Eurosport. I assume you're in the UK and that video isn't shown to you because of that?

Read the post again, it's clearly drawing a larger conclusion not limited to this dispute between the buyers of luxury cars and their makers!

And the argument that Tesla can only exist because they could mislead consumers thanks to weak American regulation seems pretty dubious.

There's also hydroelectric power, with a very long history of being economically viable.

What does that have to do with anything? That's just deflecting by posting something weird.

Long-term, there's no solution at all. In the short-term, it's a waste of resources that could be put to better use.

Long-term, humanity will die. That's the reality of the situation, we'll never travel beyond our small solar system, even. We can't technology our way out of fundamental physics problems.

This is pure sci-fi. We don't have the technology to travel within our solar system in any reasonable amount of time, let alone to bring back and mine an asteroid.

But also, it really doesn't matter. The US has way bigger problems than whether it could launch a successful moon mission for pointless political posturing.

The next question is: Are manned lunar and mars missions useful in any way? No.

The real answer: It's entirely beyond our capabilities and not achievable at all.

Or maybe don't build the station. Also, the way the US government is funded, printing money is paying for things, not taxpayers.

But also, we don't have the technology to do that, either.

Maybe. But what does that get us? We'll never be a spacefaring species, the universe is way too big (we can't even explore our solar system in any meaningful way) and energy requirements for faster travel are simply too high. Not to think of all the issues with spacetime at fast speeds.

There are tons of serious problems to solve here on earth, no need for another huge waste of money.

The mathematical models aren't running the Bitcoin network, clients running program code are. And those have had fatal flaws found in them multiple times now, it all isn't as robust as you're saying.

My Moto G8 Power (G Power in the US) Android phone has it as part of the Camera app; when you point the camera at a code, a small bubble will pop up at the bottom allowing you to follow the link/see the content.

It's desperate people trying to tell themselves that they're going to be rich soon against all evidence. It's why the date for the supposed squeeze keeps moving.

Cases and deaths are what's important? We're in a pandemic, the only way to beat that is getting people to change their behavior in order to stop the spread. Just because overall death rates aren't to your liking doesn't mean the media should report that everything is fine.

I assume there are some games that can utilize the power.

There are two versions of WSL, one is Hyper-V based, the other isn't. If you have trouble with Hyper-V, simply switch to WSL1.

There are tons of expensive monitors available that cater to the professional market. The whole premise is not based in reality. Apple simply has the highest mindshare among average products.

Why are those "the ideal resolution for mac os", exactly?

That doesn't mean you need less RAM. That reviewer doesn't know what he's talking about.

No. Just no.

Most modern games allow for the rendering resolution to be different from the resolution the UI runs at. Usually, "even" values like half the native resolution tend to look pretty good.

The feature is usually called "render scale" or similar.

The alternative is "games don't run on Linux at all". The Linux desktop market is tiny as is, the alternative isn't developers suddenly investing in native Linux ports. Even the more popular Macs OS gets severely neglected.

No other product before has had a twistable button!