Apple does the opposite by giving away their software and design “for free” and making up for it with hardware margins.
2,465 karma · joined March 1, 2010
Similarly SARS and MERS were perhaps too virulent and could thus easily be controlled by screening for symptoms, while the new coronavirus can spread without symptoms, which could possibly be attributed to the lower virulence.
If you use more than 15 GB of data in a cycle on the Fi Flexible plan or more than 22 GB in a cycle on the Fi Unlimited plan (less than 1% of individual Fi users as of Jan. 2018), you'll experience slower speeds (256 kbps) above those respective data thresholds until your next billing cycle begins.
If you need significant amounts of high speed data, you can opt to pay $10/GB for the data you use past the data threshold for your plan in a given cycle (15GB for Flexible or 22GB for Unlimited).
These data thresholds are based on individual data usage, not group data usage.
That seems like precisely the information that should require a warrant, no?
At a startup there simply isn't room to move around without taking on more significant risks and at least waiting for your first equity cliff, and honestly many startup founders I've met don't have great managements skills, or the drive to learn them. There's also simply a matter of personalities, sometimes people just don't get along with their managers and/or teammates, but the fact that you have to switch companies and re-interview again vs being able to apply to your skip-level to switch teams is a significant difference.
Some ideas of concrete options to fix these:
* Shorter cliffs, even Google has a 2 month rsu cliff now, and I think Facebook is similar
* Maybe a hiring pool, again, similar to Facebook or Google where you pick your team after you "pass" your interviews, allow you to really work with different startups and feel out what it's like. I could see YC setting up a similar program where companies can choose to share an interview pipeline and let candidates talk to different startups after passing an agreed-upon bar for the pool. This is similar to https://www.workatastartup.com/, but to not have to formally do a technical interview for every single startup would be a huge help.
* Some way to try out/transfer between startups who allow it would be awesome. Similar to Facebook's bootcamp, if there was a way to still get paid, maybe a simplified consulting agreement that YC can help broker among a few startups for a month or so while a candidate explores what it's really like to work with each startup would be really helpful.
* Management training for founders, and a standardized way to review founder's management skills. If founder's were held accountable for their management skills and rated across one of these shared pools where their ratings were available to prospective employees, they would be much more incentive to improve their skills.
We need a benchmark between 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 instead.
Ron here is saying we shouldn't kill startups (what PG calls "creating wealth"), we should instead fight against practices that actually take money from the poor and give to the rich (what PG calls "zero-sum games"). After reading PG's article, I got the impression that he wants the exact same thing as Ron does. What's there to argue?
PG even has a paragraph in his essay that is almost equivalent to the title of the article:
> There are lots of things wrong with the US that have economic inequality as a symptom. We should fix those things. In the process we may decrease economic inequality. But we can't start from the symptom and hope to fix the underlying causes.
I'm very curious to how the go runtime and GC will work.
As an Android developer, the root and vulnerability reporting behavior is pretty standard for bug tracking, and in Uber's case fraud prevention as well.
I can maybe see an extra variation for exceptions, but that would be one more generic or a Set<? extends Exception> no?