3,518 karma · joined April 16, 2014
On the bike lane, which is physically separated from the road.
The cop car takes the whole width of the lanes.
It also means the cop had to get on the bike lane here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/frGXL1NpcCW18iRN9?g_st=ac and then drive for a couple of blocks _on the physically separated bike lane_.
Like, I legitimately am trying to understand what you're saying but it's frustratingly vague. I feel like you're wasting my time with your attempt to seem like you know more than everyone else.
I am having a very hard time believing anyone would be favourable to the country currently lobbing bombs at them from halfway around the globe. Regardless of how much they dislike their current regime.
Maybe this fuels some "everyone loves America, the good guys" fantasy, but, as someone who's come from a country where the people did not like the regime, I am very skeptical foreign interference will be seen positively or even neutrally.
Or maybe this is an attempt at making the war seem somehow just and led on humanitarian and democratic principles, as opposed to what it actually is.
https://xcancel.com/eastdakota/status/2009654937303896492
Everyone looks bad in this conflict.
Literally "you're holding it wrong".
You need to look at Deere stock after taking out the beta to the market.
The US can inflate it away over time, with the main cost being the US standard of living staying flat or going down (which is annoying but very much tolerable given current American living standards). Moreover, paying for the debt by inflating it is a lot more politically palatable, as people don't usually think in inflation adjusted terms. Plus, you can take measures to fudge the official inflation numbers anyway.
Now compare this with climate issues, where no amount of financial engineering or political cost is going to fix environmental damage.
By your logic, if you were the only person in the country, you'd live like a king.
There's a segment of a few thousand pounds where your marginal tax rate skyrockets because you lose your tax free allowance at that income level.
It's stupid, annoying and has some minor economic effects, but it's very different from a 71% income tax rate.
The company is irrelevant. The focus should be on the money making scheme
This implies we want to maximise car parking spaces in a city, when, I think, you'd want to maximise enjoyment of the city.
You used to have interesting, if tediously contrarian things to say. But now it's just strawmans and weird takes like the above.
It also blasts you with a full screen subscribe popup, ostensibly in case you want to see more rehashed content.
Texas, California (the richest state lmao), Puerto Rico, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi etc