lurker69

Would you like them more if they would publish what they get, unless it somehow hurts American institutions?

Why should WikiLeaks protect only US? They arent US organization, Assange is Australian, most staffers are European based.

Your arguments sounds like it came from somebody who would say, that leaked DNC and Podesta emails should not be read, because they can hurt DNC campaign. I advise you to start advocating for big American firewall, something like China has, so you can protect US citizens from all information that might open their eyes but hurt some officials.

It very important that these tools are published, so software companies can patch their software and people are able to protect themselves. Not everyone is US citizen. Rest of the world greets any leaks from intelligence agencies from any country. If you dont want, dont update your OS and security software, the rest of the world will.

https://twitter.com/badd1e/status/821414873858850816

Alisa Shevchenko is founder of Zorsecurity (a.k.a. Esage Lab). She is one of "Russian DNC hackers" that have been sanctioned by Obamas administration. She was accused that she provided the GRU with technical research and development which is according to her absolutely not true.

> Most plausible scenario is that my company was framed: either to cover up APT28, or to introduce a target for any "Russian Hacking" blame.

theguardian.com article https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/06/russian-hacker...

forbes.com article http://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2016/12/30/alisa-...

The White House December 29, 2016 FACT SHEET: Actions in Response to Russian Malicious Cyber Activity and Harassment https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/29/fact-...

But dont post this anywhere else since it is supposed to insider info and if it became too public project might be endangered. It is bad enough that this escaped into the wild.

Although when 3301 was asked what is their opinion on documenting every step of puzzle and wiki pages, supposedly their answer was that this kind of organization of players is expected.

Dont forget: 3301 will never claim anything as they "dont exist"

"You are undoubtedly wondering what it is that we do we are much like a think tank in that our primary focus is on researching and developing techniques to aid the ideas we advocate liberty privacy security you have undoubtedly heard of a few of our past projects..."

http://uncovering-cicada.wikia.com/wiki/The_Leaked_Email http://pastebin.com/RmqxWcnB

This leaked email is legit. Only punctuation is removed to conceal leaker's ID and first line, FUUU and last two lines are added. People whose servers have been visited in 2013 said htat message leaft on servers was similar/same as that leaked email from 2012.

Second time 3301 refereed to themselves as "think tank" was in "warning pastebin" ""much like a think tank in that [their] primary focus is on researching and developing techniques to aid the ideas [they] advocate: liberty, privacy, and security.""

http://pastebin.com/RmqxWcnB http://uncovering-cicada.wikia.com/wiki/The_Leaked_Email

Legitimacy of this text is harder to prove. But it is too long not to be prepared in advance before posted on 4chan. And some 2012 "winners" confirmed hat they have seen references to Nietzsche, Jung and Jesuits in texts provided by their mentors on their secret onion git (which is offline now).

Proving anything about 3301 is impossible since those who know dont tell and those who tell dont know. If 3301 exists no real "member" will risk being expelled by revealing their secrets.

About name they are most often called just 3301 or Cicada 3301. If there are other "cells" of same organization they certainly use different names to conceal any connection between them. But in general: "You have all wondered who we are and so we shall now tell you we are an international group we have no name we have no symbol we have no membership rosters we do not have a public website and we do not advertise ourselves we are a group of individuals who have proven ourselves much like you have by completing this recruitment contest and we are drawn together by common beliefs a careful reading of the texts used in the contest would have revealed some of these beliefs that tyranny and oppression of any kind must end that censorship is wrong and that privacy is an inalienable right."