326 karma · joined October 26, 2014
The error is that the referenced rfc was not written in 1945 (the internet was not even in existence back then!) It was written in 1996. Maybe the author got confused by the rfc number which is 1945, thinking that was the year that it was written.
Just a title change? Noticed the subtitle and graphics were similar. IMHO, the “genghis” title was much better.
(https://hn.algolia.com/?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defmacro.org%2Fra... 0)
We stand on the giant shoulders of a lot of the early hackers/engineers in the Homebrew club. Hope they get the credit that they deserve.
Look - seems like you benefited from his M00C and you’re his fan boy/girl. Good for you but let’s not commit the fatal error of pandering/worshipping at the altar of authority.
The top nav bar links to a sign up page on a different domain which doesn’t mention anything about what you guys do. And the company logo on the blog just links to the main blog page.
For heaven’s sake, European names are not universal
Also in one of the comments you briefly mentioned that you can help democratize/prevent censorship? But aren’t you guys by law supposed to block certain websites? And wouldn’t your foreign ownership be under scrutiny if some incident were to happen?
That said, I have one question. What on earth was the co-founder doing? Isn't it the whole point of having co-founders so that you can share the trauma? Why did the CEO have to suffer through so much pain all alone?
Since he uses the word "worthless", how does that compare it to folks who graduated in History or anthropology or (running joke in the US) graduated in English?
Think of this: People in poor country, need to do what it takes to better their prospects. So they go for the one industry that pays relatively better. Nothing illogical about it and seems perfectly rational to me. And I can see similar trends in the US too. A lot of lamenting on "how I wished I learned to code, major in CS, etc.", given how drastically better the tech industry pays. https://levels.fyi ICYMI. Oh, the poor worthless English majors.
Also the lack of empathy was quite striking given the author himself is a recent "worthless" graduate of a technical degree - https://www.linkedin.com/in/nilesh-christopher-20831784/ Maybe he comes from an upper-middle class background and was able to pivot into journalism, but the fact that he didn't mention his own background meant that I couldn't take this article seriously.
On a more meta topic, does education always have to "worthful"?
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/mit-researchers-launch-location...
Zoom's engineering team is based in China - the product is primarily built out of there. [1]
What guarantee is there that the CCP is not intercepting/backdooring all video communications? Especially in current situations, where so much sensitive information is being discussed via Zoom?
[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/26/zoom-key-profit-driver-ahead...
[1] Interesting Codebases: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15371597
[2] Show HN: Awesome-code-reading - A curated list of high-quality codebases to read https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18293159
[1] https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/kubernetesclusterfuck...
BLAKE2b would have been the perfect choice given the adversarial nature, as it much secure and faster than MD5. [2]
MD5 is so broken, it's really poor choice for any use case - cryptographic (fundamentally broken) or not (fundamentally slow).
[1] http://ticki.github.io/blog/seahash-explained/
[2] https://leastauthority.com/blog/BLAKE2-harder-better-faster-...
18 papers/algorithms were tested
11 weren't reproducible
7 were repoducible with considerable effort but only 1 clearly outperformed the baseline but still didn't outperform a well-tuned linear ranking method
--
Travis Ebesu et al. 2018. Collaborative Memory Network for Recommendation Systems. In Proceedings SIGIR ’18. 515–524. was the only paper out 18 that was both reproducible and outperformed the baseline but did not consistently outperform a well-tuned non-neural linear ranking method
Reproducible with considerable effort but outperformed by comparably simple heuristic methods, e.g., based on nearest-neighbor or graph-based techniques.
====================
They are:
kDD:
[17] Binbin Hu, Chuan Shi, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Philip S Yu. 2018. Leveraging meta- path based context for top-n recommendation with a neural co-attention model. In Proceedings KDD ’18. 1531–1540. [SIGIR]
[23] Xiaopeng Li and James She. 2017. Collaborative variational autoencoder for recommender systems. In Proceedings KDD ’17. 305–314.
[48] Hao Wang, Naiyan Wang, and Dit-Yan Yeung. 2015. Collaborative deep learning for recommender systems. In Proceedings KDD ’15. 1235–1244.
RecSys:
[53] LeiZheng,Chun-TaLu,FeiJiang,JiaweiZhang,andPhilipS.Yu.2018.Spectral Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings RecSys ’18. 311–319.
WWW:
[14] Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings WWW ’17. 173–182.
[24] Dawen Liang, Rahul G Krishnan, Matthew D Hoffman, and Tony Jebara. 2018. Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings WWW ’18. 689–698.
Non-reproducible:
====================
KDD:
[43] Yi Tay, Luu Anh Tuan, and Siu Cheung Hui. 2018. Multi-Pointer Co-Attention Networks for Recommendation. In Proceedings SIGKDD ’18. 2309–2318.
RecSys:
[41] Zhu Sun, Jie Yang, Jie Zhang, Alessandro Bozzon, Long-Kai Huang, and Chi Xu. 2018. Recurrent Knowledge Graph Embedding for Effective Recommendation. In Proceedings RecSys ’18. 297–305.
[6] Homanga Bharadhwaj, Homin Park, and Brian Y. Lim. 2018. RecGAN: Recurrent Generative Adversarial Networks for Recommendation Systems. In Proceedings RecSys ’18. 372–376.
[38] Noveen Sachdeva, Kartik Gupta, and Vikram Pudi. 2018. Attentive Neural Archi- tecture Incorporating Song Features for Music Recommendation. In Proceedings RecSys ’18. 417–421.
[44] Trinh Xuan Tuan and Tu Minh Phuong. 2017. 3D Convolutional Networks for Session-based Recommendation with Content Features. In Proceedings RecSys ’17. 138–146.
[21] Donghyun Kim, Chanyoung Park, Jinoh Oh, Sungyoung Lee, and Hwanjo Yu. 2016. Convolutional Matrix Factorization for Document Context-Aware Recom- mendation. In Proceedings RecSys ’16. 233–240.
[45] Flavian Vasile, Elena Smirnova, and Alexis Conneau. 2016. Meta-Prod2Vec: Prod- uct Embeddings Using Side-Information for Recommendation. In Proceedings RecSys ’16. 225–232.
SIGIR:
[32] Jarana Manotumruksa, Craig Macdonald, and Iadh Ounis. 2018. A Contextual Attention Recurrent Architecture for Context-Aware Venue Recommendation. In Proceedings SIGIR ’18. 555–564.
[7] Jingyuan Chen, Hanwang Zhang, Xiangnan He, Liqiang Nie, Wei Liu, and Tat- Seng Chua. 2017. Attentive collaborative filtering: Multimedia recommendation with item-and component-level attention. In Proceedings SIGIR ’17. 335–344.
WWW:
[42] Yi Tay, Luu Anh Tuan, and Siu Cheung Hui. 2018. Latent relational metric learn- ing via memory-based attention for collaborative ranking. In Proceedings WWW ’18. 729–739.
[11] Ali Mamdouh Elkahky, Yang Song, and Xiaodong He. 2015. A multi-view deep learning approach for cross domain user modeling in recommendation systems. In Proceedings WWW ’15. 278–288.
On a related note, does anyone have a good recommendations/blog post that explains how IP addressing, ports, subnetting, etc. all work?
This is one of these things where I know that I'm just working off of empirical knowledge without knowing the fundamentals.