102 karma · joined August 15, 2023
I’d argue we’re well past the days of distinct alternative narratives around events.
Regardless, I suppose the bigger point I want to make is the truth for non clear cut things is only as true as the number of people that co-sign it. If there’s simply more people on one side, welp, that’s that. That’s the truth, as far as we know.
Right or wrong or true or false are almost not even in the equation (enter the conspiracy theorist).
I don’t know, based on what I just said, what do you believe?
You see?
The low hanging fruit to me appears to be the fact that propaganda is profitable, ::shrugs::
Just one more war machine that got repurposed for civilian use.
Edit: this actually got downvoted, yikes
History is susceptible to narratives because anything that isn’t clear cut (slavery, holocaust, etc) is open to subjective interpretation.
It’s the conspiracy theorists that are the real wildcard in all of this. They will take the clear cut (slavery, holocaust) and make that open to subjective interpretation.
Funny stuff.
These things need to be shorter and written at a 8th grade writing level, and I don’t mean that in any pejorative way. It needs to be clear to the average person (and I’m not even sure if I’m being generous there by suggesting 8th grade writing/reading level).
The prompt should read “So, you cool with that brah?”, and the word “Accept” needs to be replaced with “Yeah sure why not”, and “No” with “Nah, no thank you”.
Current TOS’s don’t provide enough clarity.
That way any semantic issues down the line can be boiled down to “brah, users said they were cool with it” (to the judge).
I'm going to get a little reductionist here. What you said is no different than arguing for creationism (not ironic, we are discussing creating ultimately). Just because Earth is a perfect planet, and we get to drive around in self driving cars, doesn't mean there is any evidence for a grand plan (or any effort of it).
Talent and intuition is kind of like discussing recursion. To first understand recursion ...
Tarantino is just a lucky talented shit, and there's no rhyme or reason for it. Any explanation he gives you after the fact, is just that, after the fact. And the rest of us trying to explain it is no different than trading derivatives.
Tell me the study and rigor that went into the Big Kahuna Burger.
I think they were fucking nuts when the sky hit them.
The advice they give you is for the life they managed afterwards, which you can get from any reasonable person on earth.
But hey, I never wrote anything worth a shit. So, I have no credibility.
So you think he took an academic approach? Dude dropped out of high school and worked in a video rental store. You are only applying the pastel of studious (the puns are just flying today) because he didn't make absolute shit. If he did make absolute shit, we'd say "gee my god, that's what happens when you drop out of high school and think watching movies is enough to write a good movie".
Right? No seriously, right?
Me and you disagreeing is proof enough we have no idea where this stuff comes from.
But I’ll concede, I don’t understand the purpose of offering general life rules under the guise of writing well. I really don’t. Is it an exercise in authority, or flexing a mandate, or what exactly is it? It sure as hell ain’t any real insight into writing.
But to get your ass to sit on the chair and bang those keys, that does not come from the sky, anyone who has actually tried will tell you that.
Writers block, right? Or, when the sky stops talking to you. Now that’s a phenomenon that’s worth describing.
But alas, pace yourself, got it. I’ll try not finish the entire burger, and save the rest for later. Shocked they didn’t mention a small walk, or coffee with an old friend.
What’s up my ass today I guess.
claim that you could work in blocks of multiple hours and never socialise with other writers and see the same results?
Yep. There were some writers that were straight up bed-ridden. They would laugh at your little ruleset.
Lastly, I wasn’t downvoted. A reasonable amount of people seem to agree.
You can have whatever ruleset you want, your ass ain’t making Reservoir Dogs or writing Old Man and the Sea. Now imagine either of those two writers gave you a list of rules to follow. You’d throw that piece of paper in the garbage.
It’s a like a hot girl giving you work-out and diet advice. Thanks, I’m sure that’s what really got you your beauty.
It’s from the SKY.
Iran supplies Russia with drones. I can promise you Russia will help Iran enrich their uranium. They are both pariah states, what do they have to lose? Nuclear Iran, here enters Israel.
Everyone’s arming up, there’s a gun fight coming.
Someone utilize p2p for the love of god. Pretty sure there’s gigabytes of porn moving (freely) through the internet millions of times per day.
Humans don’t become obsolete, we become bored. This tech will make us bored. When humans get too bored and need shit to stir up, we’ll start a war. Take US and China, global prosperity is not enough right? We need to stoke the flames of war over Taiwan.
In the next 300 years we’ll wipe out most of each other in some ridiculous war, and then rebuild.
The days of getting paid well for making crud are numbered (which most of us do, even in the most interesting problem spaces).
# need a front end boilerplate that hits a backend with the following end points. REST api for movies catalogue, and a corresponding ui. Oh, unit tests please. Go with a responsive design and also make a React Native version (matter of fact provision it to my iPhone). Decide between Heroku or AWS, set up deploy with git hooks.
# scrape IMDb for initial population of the db
# I think a Reddit like comment system would be good to add, so add it. No upvote/downvote though
# handle user login with google/fb/email
# also make an admin page to manage all this
I guess the technical product designer will be the new unicorn.
We’re going to move from debugging some crap the last developer wrote to debugging an order of magnitude more code the last developer generated.
It’s going to be wonderful for job prospects really.
At scale this has been a failure through and through.
Shoutout out the ultimate technical school of all, MIT.
How? Who knows. Guess they know the right people.
——-
From my own experience, I will add that educational requirements are almost financial. You need it to be free, educationally. The same way you need money to be free.
But back on point, don’t add swindlers collecting a check on that trek, certainly not on loan, certainly not beyond affordability.
——
You make this money and you are free to spend how you spend. You learn this, and you are free to learn how you learn.
Psychosocial.
Again, this is a consumer affairs issue. These universities are doing false advertising, period.
Where are my AI JS blog post generators at?
Unless … No can’t be … There’s no way these articles have been AI generated this whole time … right? RIGHT?