These guys had already signed a deal to build - giving them permission and probably an agreed price - the money was to persuade them to give that up.
40,189 karma · joined September 5, 2016
Do deliver and they don't get paid because the buyer purchased with money that doesn't exist.
Lose-lose situation!
Clearly the weighting of those things depends on the usecase
On return, the contents of the washing machine were pretty much this.
This seems like a very odd rule. What about things like CNN? Aren't they available to 100% of households?
The fact this doesn't seem to be happening suggests that perhaps the copyright owner doesn't care?
Or they're going to try to build much bigger LLM's which are smarter.
The former isn't very defensible, won't work super well due to current models not discovering very many things per billion tokens.
The latter turns them into any-old AI company.
I don't normally bet against Jeff Dean, but in this case I'm not so sure.
These professional services will defend themselves with gatekeeping. Suddenly it doesn't depend anymore on the quality of your legal advice, but whether it has been stamped by a qualified Lawyer. It doesn't matter that your taxes are correct, but whether they are submitted by an approved accountant. Etc.
Makes sense - they had been there ~20 years and must have a huge pile of stock.
But due to musks political aura (mostly right leaning), the smart minds from universities(which are mostly left leaning) are no longer joining spacex en-mass.
In turn, that means the companies are merely ticking along, not racing ahead.
Those smart minds have mostly left spacex now, since musk changed political sides and became much less 'cool' for the brightest to work at.
That's why the company is struggling now - few smart minds means little progress.
Eg. Draw me a map, but include only data points tagged with 'osm-license-verified-and-spam-filtered'.
That way users of the data get to decide their own tradeoff between legal risks, data freshness, spam, etc.
The longer they wait, the more they get to steal after all.
They are the perfect bug for someone trying to "accidentally" make a secure system insecure.
I wonder if bribe money was involved or three letter agencies...
If a water supply chain attack happened, we would just distribute bottled water for drinking, and people would go without washing for a few days whilst the issue was sorted.
Bottled water production is already big enough that delivering a bottle a day per person in new York is within the scale of the current production and retail networks scope.
It wouldn't cause the mass casualties an enemy might assume.
The liquid electrolyte is the thing that releases most energy when the battery burns, more than the anode and cathode. Some also have a very low self ignition temperature.
Moreso if your current employer is a stealth AI startup which hasn't yet produced much notable.
It also can encourage employees to work for fewer wages... 'If you do great work you can publish and then get a $$$$$$ job offer at OpenAI, or you can stay here and get equity in a fast growing startup. If however your work doesn't do well, you walk away from a bankrupt startup with worthless shares and minimum wage'
How sure are we that it was an accident to share password hashes with the world?
If you could fill a train track as much as a road is filled, it would be very cheap
Nothing complex
Standard Def TV was plenty for 50 years. But when more was on offer, everyone went for it, and now you can't even buy a 480p TV.
It could do with a UI tweak though so that by default it shows you the most 'zoomed in' geohash with any activity.
With effort, various exploitable WiFi chipsets could probably have support added too. 2km of range makes mesh networking possible even with very low user densities, especially if combined with store-and-forward.
And then there is always the possibility of a hardware dongle with LoRA with 10km range.