3,022 karma · joined March 7, 2012
A technologist, founder, and current Googler, I've repeatedly taken products from inception to commercial success across sectors, from startups to Fortune 10 companies. My specialty lies in bridging the gap between business vision and technical execution, deeply engaging with code and who mentors teams. Beyond engineering, I bring a global perspective from living abroad for nine years and speaking fluent French.
Get in touch with me: --------------------- @jlyman j @ joshualyman.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/joshualyman
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jlyman; my proof: https://keybase.io/jlyman/sigs/c1xpV7dq3vEGU8gVObbZqSDE1_-E5t97Gl7HCQ98ebk ]
With the separation of react and react-dom, this is more of a possibility than in the past. I know it would be a Herculean effort, but it would certainly be an incredibly interesting option for me and I'm sure many others! Still, definitely starring this repo.
I never hit it, because I have very few health needs. But add a pregnancy and delivery into the mix and you're set. It's the opposite effect of what the theory in the article supposed, but just one data point.
A few associates and I are working on a (very very alpha) tool for plotting out actual expenditures for all plans for which you qualify, giving you a report of where you'll spend the least based on your expected health events. The tool saved me over $4,000 this year by guiding me towards a better health plan than what I had originally picked out when I switched to self employment.
If interested, check out http://lucentary.com/ (but please keep in mind we're still fleshing out an MVP!).
What I'd really like to see is a open source or free tool accomplishing similar things to what RedGate SQL Compare does. Now that's a powerful tool and certainly worth its cost, but in some situations a limited option due to its support for only SQL Server or where funds are lacking.
To some extent it doesn't matter because it's just such a massive and impressive number, but I'd be curious to know.
Occasionally, even with Safe Search turned on, images that I don't want my children seeing will pop up under oddly innocuous searches. And it's easy to accidentally stumble upon it, especially to untrained searchers.
Now I know people will have varying opinions about the subject, but I for one (and I know I'm not alone) don't want to view pornography, and certainly don't want my children viewing it, so a filtering service like OpenDNS is awesome. Beyond pornography, there's a lot of other good stuff that you can restrict as well, like hate/discrimination sites, dating sites, etc.--stuff that I don't need and don't need my kids getting involved with an online dating site right now.
From the "we just got acquired" FAQ:
> The free service will continue to operate. It’s part of who we are, and Cisco loves who we are. We wouldn’t have entered into this agreement if we believed our free service would be in jeopardy. On contrary, Cisco’s commitment back to you is to maintain OpenDNS’s DNS services exactly as it is today. In their words: “This level of service for all users is a priority.”
If it is there for pinned sites, why not add it for all of them?
I love it because it removes any problem with politics or shadowy discussions, and I know what I can expect when a promotion comes. The only downside is that it leaves the firm with little leverage when it comes to compensation: I can't simply get a bump without a promotion, nor are there extra bonuses that can be given out either for hiring or retaining. (This has its benefits as well however.)
- Falling in love with a product (rather than the problem) is really dangerous
- It's really hard to build a product if you don't have a big personal investment in the problem it solves
I have a collection of RAW photos that have, due to bad transfers or old disks, become corrupted in ways where you can still see the original image, but color casts are off for half the image (strong purple or orange casts) or the image will suddenly jump and skip a few hundred pixels at random places. It seems like I am just missing a portion in the middle or something is misaligned, and I'd love to get these photos back. (I know that a JPG preview is hidden inside the file, which I could extract, but it would be nice to have the full image back as well.)
Couldn't be much further from that...