lif

Absolutely.

the good: author makes strong points about pitfalls of social media

the bad: appears to absolve his favored politicians; very politically biased

(iykyk)

And yes, 4 hours/day in the morning, intent here is just for most mentally demanding work to take place then

Overall, the above is to serve as a core time structure/focus principle (so to be clear, am NOT claiming ALL types/levels of work can be fitted into just 16h/wk -- tho ~30h/wk is worth striving for, imo)

the idea is to optimize for quality, and grind as needed in the later part of the work day.

Where there is a will there is a way.

Now, notice I did NOT say that there actually is sufficient will, at the moment.

developers mass-producing cheap, inhumane housing, set on tiny parcels designed to maximize developer profit MEETS most potential buyers/renters have zero interest in that crap

?

That said, one might make the case that the list of Prof Boxall is rather severely skewed. (Not that there was any objective claim made as to why one must read the listed books before any others.) E.g., at a glance, there are quite a few utter masterpieces missing.

Hence, why not make your own 'top' list?

(And if anyone has a better tool than: https://johnbintz.com/prioritize/

please do share!)

speculation:

"There's a good chance"

and hypocrisy:

"really reckless and unbounded, in a way that is significantly outside of the norms of what we see in the espionage space"

Personally, I have seen many articles, esp. of individuals who just before had become publicly visible, re-written drastically enough to cast serious doubt on the objectivity of Wikipedia.

It would appear as a society you can have either foster trust (we may have forgotten how to do this?) or feed a bloated police/surveillance/intel state, but not both?

Am curious about others experiences with these matters!

-Aitanic

While master may be too kind a word, maybe something like: The o3 doesn't fall far from the sama?

and tl;dr: no, they are hardly re-inventing.

"the architecture taking shape in low-Earth orbit appears to be more akin to SpaceX's military-grade Starshield satellites and the Space Development Agency's future tranches of data relay and missile-tracking satellites."

"China has now placed 72 Guowang satellites into orbit"

"SpaceX has already launched nearly 200 of its own Starshield satellites"

What would happen if real estate investors/developers by law also had to dwell in the most dense type of housing they built?

Hypothesis: Humans by and large are all looking for a bit more breathing room, privacy, and quality of life in their choice of home. (In other words, qualities diametrically opposed to the black hole compression cubicle end game of 'efficient housing for the masses').

any hardware (e.g. phone) recommendations?

(if he is right, then one of the above is likely, right?)

(otoh, if he is wrong, does anyone have some very solid, well considered counterpoints to share?)