Efficient markets.
786 karma · joined December 19, 2011
Director http://of Mattereum.de
Terms, conditions, and disclaimers apply.
This is not legal advice, it's barely even life advice.
Efficient markets.
They’d take 40% of the upside and live on ramen noodles.
VCs make money by raising money from LPs.
They spend this money on investments which don’t look too bad if they fail, because nearly all of them fail. Looking good while losing all of your investors money on companies which go broke is the key VC skill.
Once in a while you get a huge hit. That’s a lottery win, there is no formula for finding that hit. Broad bets helps but that’s about it. The “VC thesis” is a fundraising tool, a pitch instrument, it makes no measurable difference to success. It’s a shtick.
Sympathy, however, for the VC: car dealership sized transactions paired with the diligence burdens of real finance. It’s a terrible job.
Once you understand that VC is one of the worst jobs in finance and they don’t believe most of their own story — it’s fundraising flimflam for their LPs - it’s a lot easier to negotiate.
1) we are a sound bet not to get you in trouble if we fail (good schools and track records)
2) we will work hard on things which your LPs and their lawyers understand, leaving evidence of a good effort on failure
3) we know how the game works and will play by the unwritten rules: keep up appearances
The kind of lunatics who actually stand to make money with a higher probability than average - the “Think Different” category - usually violate all of these rules.
1) they have no track record
2) they work on esoteric nonsense
3) they look weird in public
And they’re structurally uninvestable.
Once you get this it’s all a lot easier: the job of a VC is not to invest in winners, that’s a bonus.
The job of a VC is to look respectable while losing other people’s money at the roulette wheel, and taking a margin for doing so.
I hope that helps.
Meth.
1) governments didn’t get to print money at will until they went off the gold standard, and the financial regime we have now is worse than the gold era. (Highly dubious, I don’t buy this entirely)
2) blockchain done right gives hub-and-spoke efficiency without creating hegemons like VISA, SWIFT and PayPal to boss around their users with impunity.
This I believe entirely.
8. As the Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice in England and Wales, I hold an office that pre-dates modern trade in derivatives and reinsurance, even steam engines, powered flight, and certainly the internet. I am particularly and obviously concerned about the reputation and development of English law and the jurisdiction of England and Wales. 9. Many people do not realise that English law governs trading in €600 trillion of OTC derivatives annually, in €11.6 trillion in metals trading, in £250 billion in M&A deals, and in £80 billion in insurance contracts every year – just to take a few examples. My hope is that English law will prove to be the law of choice for borderless blockchain technology as its take up grows exponentially in the months and years to come.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Speech-M...
Case closed.
https://kk.org/books/what-technology-wants
"By mapping the behavior of life, we paradoxically get a glimpse at where technology is headed-or “what it wants.” Kevin Kelly offers a dozen trajectories in the coming decades for this near-living system."
It's looking a bit like the struggle between armoured knights and guns. The place where the rubber really meets the road on this, the Big Problem, is surface navy: what's the lifespan of a floating metal castle in the age of hypersonic missiles?
Nobody wants to talk about that.
It's not a genocidal war of annihilation. It's not WW2 redux. It's not Holodomor 2.0. I do not think everybody realises how low the stakes of this conflict really are.
In 20 years they'll manufacture just one plane, and it'll cost a trillion dollars, if current trends continue to hold.
Also it'll the weight of an aircraft carrier.
It could be that in practice an AI can't really generalise well to All People compared to humans, because the humans are so diverse and the humans who are doing some jobs generalise to just the small set of people they are working with.
Right now it does look like prompts like "answer this as if you're one of Napoleon's generals" work fairly well, but I wonder if in practice we'll find out that specific human experiences which are hard to document will turn out to create niches which AI is very very poor at dealing with.
Potential examples:
* what does it feel like to fall in love? humans can't describe well.
* what does it feel like to summit Everest for the first time? ditto.
* what are spiritual experiences like?
Probably many other areas which are clearly important to people, particularly falling in love, but language is weak, and at the end of the day...
It's a large language model.
Worshipping gods is an old human sport, and it wouldn't need *much* encouragement for humans to see an AI system as a sort of "village god" –– the kinds of entities which were worshipped all over the world before One Big God religions became common. A "Tesla Kami" which talks from your Tesla, and also talks for The Teslas, and also talks for Tesla, Inc. for example could be highly charismatic and not even slightly humanoid in appearance.
If you think I'm joking, consider the Knight Rider TV series with a talking car. Cars can have charisma even if they don't talk, but add a voice-and-mind and we're off to the races, so to speak.
Charisma is a funny thing.
If it's just about learning how to fight really really fast the WW2 combatives courses seem to be the best available system. I don't think any martial art is suited to the speed and directness of modern life.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D5DGpORANE
I think that's a pretty good example of what "people who can actually fight well use tai chi techniques" looks like. A lot of force is going into those throws, bodies are flying, and they aren't students doing a demonstration for a crowd. Legit.
Younger kung fu people wouldn't generally be so into Tai Chi. You'd learn it as you aged so that as you became less athletic you'd be substituting smart for strong and extending your lifetime as an effective fighter. All of this context was lost when it came to the west.
Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Chengfu this is kinda what top tier tai chi people used to look like: neckless bears with fists the size of your head.
Also: weapons. In China open hand stuff is taught before you attempt the complexity of swinging round a sword but these were (and are) armed arts. Nobody shows up at a real fight without a machete or sabre I believe.
But... if... run multiple cities off the waste heat from the compute. Easy to see the chain of logic which runs from there to the Dyson sphere made of computronium.
We live in interesting times!
Finally?
1) there is a network
2) on each block, a leader is selected to make the next block on the basis of a lottery -- each lottery ticket is a unit of computing done ("proof of work")
3) if the network splits, each subnet has a different leader and a different sequence of blocks from that point onwards
4) when the network comes back together, a new "agreed history" is formed from the last shared block, selecting the block with the most "work" done
and resulting in the transactions which were done and confirmed in the smaller subnet being thrown out and history rewritten as if they had never existed
This is the genius of Satoshi -- he figured out that something this trashy was good enough to get something done. Nobody in an academic setting would ever have considered that as a worthwhile solution I don't think.
It was madness. But it worked. It's the same kind of genius as Ethernet just rebroadcasting packets until something works rather than doing Token Ring type negotiation about who can talk next.
Worse really is better at times.
One hand went up in the back. That's when I knew our culture was doomed.
CAP is (for the record) why the blockchain is and is not "just a database" -- it's a database which takes a different position on CAP and as a result can be used for different things to other databases.