laimewhisps

If you have some sort of proof that people are upset by this action you should post it. Using ad hominem against me isn't accomplishing anything. You can't just claim people's observations are invalid because we're all in a "filter bubble".

I'm not in a filter bubble but I have seen many, completely opposing communities support this murder. On my town's FB tons of "regular" people are very enthusiastic about it. Same with both the left and the right on every platform I'm on. I would say there's a very small minority opposed to this and I haven't run across any of them in the real world.

While anti-BDS laws are a violation of US citizens rights, they don't cover this case. It's not "illegal" for Google to not do business with Israel. These are state level laws targeting US business that say they can't get state contracts if they oppose Israel.

It actually seems like they're spotlighting their execs and that they have been doing things that would make them a target.

This sounds like the same way because if rich people need protection, they must be under threat of people who feel exploited by them. Just like the OP.

If it becomes a risk to the CEO to have high compensation, then yes the shareholders will want a cut.

They printed "defend", "deny", "depose" on the bullets so it's reasonable to assume that was the motive.

When the state's monopoly on violence doesn't protect people, people will find a way to protect themselves.

This is why CEO pay transparency is so important!

He was killing people though, and if his death stops that, it's a net positive. His life is not worth more than the thousands he has ended for personal profit.

According to that poll only 65% are happy with their health care coverage (page 8):

https://news.gallup.com/file/poll/654047/2024_12_06%20Health...

On page 5 you can see 79% are dissatisfied with the cost of health care.