kodyo

Ask a heroin user. They clearly want to, and right now they have to deal with some unsavory characters and products.

The dumbest aspect of state run healthcare is that people like you think you get to vote on what kind of health care other people "need."

> It just makes it impossible for the federal government to do its job.

Where do I sign up?

You can't vote your way out of an oligarchy. You can destroy and replace it, or you can secede from it.

This appears to be the opinion of the three people who signed their name to the post on this particular website, who appear to have nominated themselves to speak on behalf of the Apache tribes. There's not even an About Us page that describes their tribal influence.

I'm not dismissing the feelings of anybody other than these three people who are claiming a grievance. If the movement grows, I'll reconsider.

The US government is the bloodiest, most indebted, and most imprisoning institution on the planet.

And I agree, it is astoundingly well-functioning at it.

I can imagine alternatives that aren't one of a) unlimited fascist oligarchy (present) and b) unlimited corporate oligarchy (your proposed alternative).

The kind of people who want to govern other people are not the kind of people we should encourage.

>I am all for legalization of drugs, but without also massive investments in housing, mental health, and addiction recovery, it won't accomplish the goals. We also need a functioning police and judicial system.

You would probably argue that you'd need those things when drugs are illegal, too, so I'm not sure what your disagreement is.

More accurately, the current paradigm drives the drug trade into the hands of degenerate street criminals.

I don't believe doctors should be the gatekeepers to determine how high you should get.

As opposed to right now, when I'd have to buy it from a street dealer?

Think through the question before you ask it.

Yes, all drugs should be available to everybody. I don't trust the medical establishment to do this right, I don't trust regulators, and people have a right to die if they choose to.

I understand my opinion is outside of the mainstream.

Drug legalization is probably the best bet if preventing deaths is one of the priorities of "policy makers."

In my state, I can walk into an actual shop with actual employees who can sell me packaged marijuana and be reasonably confident that it isn't laced with some Chinese rat poison or Frankenstein chemical.

It's so crazy how socialism keeps failing people. Totally unpredictable.

The bill with a catchy name doesn't appear to apply to the government itself.

That’s stupid.

We can blame them if it was obviously wrong, and it was obviously wrong at the time.

The numbers showed very early on that kids and healthy adults weren’t all that susceptible to COVID.

It’s crazy that people respond to incentives.

Parts of it were and they were utterly destroyed 160 years ago.

Most parents are not going to artificially cripple their kids out of some charitable sense of equity.

Decisions about how to raise your kids is where the DEI rubber hits the road.

I was surprised to learn that the number of people who can only think in terms of single variables is staggering, and that the main variable they consider was what the last asshat on TV said it should be.

Where do drug addiction and lunacy rank in the drivers of homelessness?

I got rid of cable and the Xfinity platform. Replaced it with a Xbox series X and the streaming apps work 10x better.

I don’t watch a lot of shows, bit when I do there is almost no technology friction.

How do you distinguish singular they from plural they?

Shit's getting weird, man.

They held first place for a good while, though.

The cost of externalities are covered when litigants claim damages.

Really? I would very much expect that most people would have a strong negative opinion about the morality of incest.

The design wizards are the ones who came up with gray text on light gray background, so there's plenty of dipshittery to go around.