knollimar

I'm saying they can't take shortcuts like prefabbing walls without the stuff that goes in walls in them or at lesst coordinated sleeved etc

You still have to solve all the MEPs so where does that go in your process?

Ever try putting a brick wall on a truck?

Ethically sure but that doesn't mean taking from them is nothing "illicit".

I'm sure they put some BS in their TOS

So have the open weight ones but faster?

I don't have a horse in this argument but catching up doesn't imply the one in the lead has stagnated

I'm trying to teach a subordinate to draft and he keeps saying "this feels automatable" before he undedstands how to do it. I had to explicitly tell him "do not try to automate [particular task] before you know how to do it. He has not successfully finished said task once, and I caught him working on it on Friday...

I meant the metaphorical iphone ones

It looks like you refusing when you call it's point stupid enough and ask it to think more when it keeps reasserting a bad point.

Are the yellow dots not opt in?

Haven't ram prices been a linear drop since 2010 before chatgpt rampocalypse? I don't think it's "still" anymore but perhaos some progress will be made in the model front

Glm 5.3 won't fit on a mac mini. The barrier to entry to host something scary is what, like $10k? 20k?

Was the animation objectively bad? like was it bad for the user and he was right or were you wronged?

"I don't know what it means to "own website issues""

made me irate. It was very clear! Read the issues and be accountable for fixing them?

Upon further reflection, I realize there's two "impedance matching". I, and other EEs, will assume I mean the complex conjugate matching to redirect power toward load.

The author is making the argument about minimizing reflections across a medium. The trumpet, and AR coating land. The other points are more tortured. The transformer example in particular invites nitpicking.

The first three examples they use are filters.

The abstraction of impedance matching should be to "tune things to make them more efficient in their usability".

Their examples don't sit with impedance matching to me. They're all conversions or filters. The first thing was either not usable or they purely chopped off a part, not pointed it in the right direction.

In fact, the examples more or less all sit in a group in which impedance matching does not belong

Edit: the car transmission I'll give since there's a power vs speed decision that needs to be coupled

Surely the researcher has way more constraints and is thus less creative in their job?

I'm all for finding the joy in things, but the author starts with the comparison and then uses the ability to find creativity with it being a requisite part of the job.

Surely the person with more pertage of trdious work has a more tedious and less creative job.

Imagine if someone made this argument about dollars per hour, and the exec said they work overtime often so the valet has no right to complain about pay since they can look harder for tips.

Rare like a steak not like a treasure.

"a clear mental image from the very first word"

Nothing meaningful was said for 9 words.

Objective consideration of contemporary phenomena compels the conclusion that the words appearing here could be anything

I think the grating one is that it's constructed to sound effective when it shouldn't!

Good points should be rewarded confidence. I read so many not X it's Y where the distinction beteeen X and Y isn't relevant to the discussion!

The most frustrating one is when it does the papering over analysis and adding pushback to seem helpful. No, there shouldn't be a spot "where you pushback" unless it makes sense and responds to someone's concern!

Like with an LLM I would rewind the conversation. What do I do, shame them?

Are you passing well organized layers?

Well maybe they have another suspicipus theory for defense of your data. Like taking it, laundering it through a summarizer, and training on that. Surely that's less questionable than taking copyrighted stuff and saying "don't output over 15 words, never verbatim" pretty please.

"Beating opus" is the false part, no?

Wait the 20x doesnt multiply the weekly?

They gave a point that it sort of inverts tbe meaning

The LEAN example is the ideal case. It's like a baby POC to me.

I can only assume the only realistic way to get all the federated data will be a ton of massivr vertical consolidation of industry by hubris laden tech execs crossing industry domains.

Throw understanding images in there and it becomes less true in my experience. Sure they shit out code and search text well, but one infographic and they circle trying to rasterize it.

Construction isn't using LLMs any time soon like that. We don't even send our files in structured data because everyone's playing nose goes for liability and sending pdfs

I don't even think procrastination is laziness as you end up having to do the work later.