knewter

For one thing, because it's important to know the lower bound of success in order to identify the reasonableness of the proposed solution, competing its perceived costs with its perceived benefits.

Cool cool flip the burden of proof

Power corrupts

This is what op is talking about

The answer is sitting there for you if you'd just believe your government acted like humans

The beam is a pretty good scheduler though

I think it's neat reading people comment here that don't know who piotr solnica is. He's not some ruby schlub that is unfamiliar with the tradeoffs he was discussing

The issue here is the fourth amendment

Yes but also just use patroni and wal-g.

This isn't what arrogance is though.

Look at the length of your reply versus mine and the depth of assumptions you have made from my small post and recognize you're a loony.

Wait til you hear about the Russia collusion thing

Anecdotal, are you calling my friends liars?

Counterpoint: I love america and loved 1776 references long before the 1619 project was a thing. There was no renewed interest on the part of me or my compatriots.

Though if people consistently over decades sing a language's praises on a single point consistently like they do the beam on this point, it's usually not without merit

"we've done a bunch of studies and found no positive benefits but, like, maybe? Anyway, wear it if you want to partake in society"

In San Francisco this was because people stopped reporting crimes since the cops didn't help. Unsure of LA

How do you propose that I find out if someone has a problem with x?

The screenshot is a single question. How is asking a question combative? (I ask that non-combatively, in the weakest possible reading of the words)

I rarely see such a succinct explanation of postmodernist morality

Yes, but their GPUs were far lower performance

They were in a Jira with the government banning accounts that upset government administrators

On what timeline do you believe this to be the case

When people make the first half of this argument, as they do readily do, and omit this second half, you can use that as a heuristic for "unserious"

Growing up there was an ad on the radio each year around arbor day. A grizzled old man's voice says "when I was growing up, my dad and I would go to the forest each year on arbor day to plant some trees." It encouraged the same behaviour.

A forest is kind of by definition at capacity for how many trees will grow there. Planting a tree elsewhere means it will not suffer from the canopy blocking all it's light.

So many saplings senselessly murdered by well-meaning wordcels.

As I understand it, exclusivity with ASML comes solely from their limited production capacity. Just buy all the machines for the year.

Homeschool your kids. No one else cares about them

I was a believer

Fireworks was the closest thing to figma we got before figma. It was the very best webdev design tool before adobe bought and murdered it.

I remember being excited that Photoshop was going to start to work more like fireworks when they bought it. What a naive dummy I was.

This is my experience and that of everyone I talk to in my daily life. It's like a very weird bubble on HN and in the media, where people are ignoring things like "my tracked expenses for groceries are 60% higher than they were in 2019, and my restaurant budget has grown though I go out to eat 1/3 as much"

I don't have to guess about these things, I have receipts. Still, everyone here and on the news tells me things are great!