knd775

I'm curious why you would choose to maintain Verizon's policy changes that alienated the majority of the user-base.

That makes perfect sense, and seems like those most likely explanation. Thanks.

Wouldn't their license plate be in quotes, though? 'NULL' != NULL

There was a time where call of duty ghosts was exploitable, and people could wipe/delete the accounts of anyone whose username/gamertag they knew. Streamers and pro players had to use barcode usernames to avoid getting their accounts deleted.

Selling a vaccine for a disease to virtually every person alive can make more money than selling drugs to treat a disease to the few people that actually get that disease.

I'm not sure how that would work. Apple isn't just sitting on exploits.

a "non-vulnerability"

Subdomains in general still show, just not www. Also, in the case you mentioned, the subdomains are the same. The path still shows.

They launched tintin A and B on SSO-A. They maneuvered to the correct orbits.

Starlink sats can maneuver to different orbits. Their original test sats launched on an SSO launch.

This seems likely. If customers drop out, they can just toss in a couple starlink sats.

I think it's because they aren't really supposed to be human readable. It's trivial for an application to do (PRI % 8) to get the severity, and ((PRI - severity) / 8) to get the facility number. I'd assume that's why severity only goes to 7.

I'm not exactly happy about mass LPR, either.

Oops, they actually just went into a tunnel and it couldn't get a GPS lock.

Automation and scale

No, this is what Brazil should've done decades ago but could not due to corruption and short-sightedness. Nowadays, the only model that they are trying to replicate is that of authoritarian regimes.

Great! So now the police can go through my personal information because I happen to look slightly like a criminal from a certain angle.

Basic facial structure (the kind that can be captured from CCTV) is an order of magnitudes less unique than fingerprint data.

Yeah, this is a pain. I'm glad we have the OTA library, though. Saves so much time.

Not only that, it was the same github profile that contained her resume!

From what I've read, that was an fairly accurate (but dramatized) portrayal of him. He had a crazy life.

They've been using soft paywalls which allow people to read a certain number of articles per month for free. To prevent users from simply using incognito mode to pretend every visit is their first visit, publishers started detecting incognito mode and blocking them from reading articles using it (without signing in).

Ah, here you go then.

https://www.home-assistant.io/components/xiaomi_aqara/

https://github.com/home-assistant/home-assistant/tree/dev/ho...

Have you seen actual mx switches? I've got a handful on my desk here. Including the stems, they are ticker than my entire laptop by themselves. They just came out with "low-profile" switches, but they're still hardly thin at all. I really doubt many people would buy a laptop at least 3x the thickness of the current models.

(By the way, Cherry makes scratchy and cheap feeling switches. The low profile ones are even worse.)

They generally receive updates until there is a reason why they can't.

IPv6 is weird for someone coming from IPv4. Basically every IPv6 address is a public IP address. Your firewall is responsible for blocking inbound traffic from actually getting to the devices at these addresses. This replaces NAT. So, what I do is have a default rule that blocks all IPv6 traffic inbound. Then, instead of a NAT rule, port forwarding, etc., I just allow inbound traffic on certain ports to certain addresses.

It's definitely possible to use both at the same time. But, there's no reason to.

What do you mean by export its data?

Transparent California goes even further than that. https://transparentcalifornia.com/

Wise? You think encryption back doors are wise?