776 karma · joined March 21, 2008
I think the situation will improve, but it seems to be an uphill battle against corruption in the regulatory bodies.
I do wish there were more software employed for the enforcement. e.g. it's blatantly obvious that there is insider trading if you examine spikes in volume prior to M&A announcements. I can't imagine it would be that hard to mine the transaction data for offenders.
But as the article says, you can't build up a good database of evidence if you are regularly purging the data.
"A combination of excessive bureaucracy and corrupt officials makes it a hazardous enterprise."
Isn't that the same in the US?
Yes, except - in America, the government bribes business; in Soviet Russia, you bribe the government.
As I understand it, they are still doing mostly consulting engagements. While lucrative, I expect them to build a product soon, if they are not already doing so. Anyone care to speculate?
Whereas vesting is just linked with the passage of time, putting in milestones is very dangerous. It can lead to all sorts of erratic behavior, all in the name of achieving milestones, which may or may not be relevant. You can't just look into the future and know what the right goals will be.
VCs definitely include vesting schedules but tend to avoid milestones.