Statistically that's not true. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
2,053 karma · joined February 28, 2007
Statistically that's not true. I don't understand what you're trying to say.
And I don't follow your premise that inherent differences wouldn't be quantitatively consistent. That's how it is with all the other measurable differences between races.
Top ten reasons not to run marathons: http://www.arthurdevany.com/2005/08/top_ten_reasons.html
IQ is well known to be highly heritable. I would be very surprised if proper research came up with a null result on fertility heritability.
And it may not even generally be true. It might just be how things appear right now given current circumstances. If you cut off immigration to the US, which is driving growth, I doubt the white fertility rate would stay at or below replacement. Wages for low skill labor would rise and fertility would go up. Who knows what the birth rate in Japan would be if their economic policy were not so incompetent.
Certainly there would be many more farmers (less efficient) without this gent's green revolution advancements and the food would be more expensive, but it's baseless to assert everyone would have starved otherwise.
So the subjects didn't know how to lift and the researchers didn't know how to instruct the subjects to lift. The suggestion that a proper 20 minute lifting session would be less intense than 20 minutes on a treadmill is ridiculous. Done correctly lifting will leave you gasping for air.
Humans don't think in syntax trees.
In Fail-Safe Investing Harry said to allocate your wealth equally between: stocks (broad market index), bonds, gold, and cash (CDs, money market). Rebalance back to equal allocations roughly once a year. Try not only to diversify a fraction of this internationally, but make sure to have some wealth entirely outside your home country out of reach of your government.
This portfolio has the critical property of stability, which is very important yet underrated for most personal investors, who are told to go heavy on equities. It captures inverse correlations so that it tends to grow steadily, rather than shoot up and down along a growth trend as equity markets do. It underperformed equities during the late 90s, but never nosedived in the early 2000s and actually continued to grow.
It has done very well historically. It grows steadily in each of an inflationary, deflationary, or high growth macro environment.
One can argue whether road costs are covered by user fees or not. The subsidized policing and EMS costs are typically ignored, for example. You might want to include some of the military and intel budgets related to oil security.
I think a major piece of the puzzle is that living in a car dependent area has been an effective way for the middle class to segregate from poor people. If you're not rich enough for the well policed part of the city, you can still get a car and live somewhere poor people have difficulty getting getting to.
Why would Java be the fastest way to do computations with Hadoop? You can use many languages for the map/reduce pieces. The fastest language would be fastest language, not necessarily Java.
I remain skeptical of these micro benchmarks. Almost every time I've messed around with porting pieces of C++ to Java or C# and benchmarking it I get a large difference in favor of C++.
Women choosing to have children out of wedlock has a huge effect on everyone. Much more than some guy offering unpaid internships.