1,490 karma · joined February 21, 2017
Fixing the issue was a small matter. But the amount of disrespect I felt, that I looked at it closer then anyone else apparently (which wasn't really all that close at all), when they were ostensibly building this code, that disrespect was just immense.
Go is one of the few packing systems that got these right.
I avoid anything to do with NPM, except for the typescript compiler, and I'm looking forward to the rewrite in Go where I can remove even that. For this reason.
As a comparison, in Go, you have minimum version spec, and it takes great pains to never execute anything you download, even during compilation stage.
NPM will often have different source then the github repo source. How does anyone even trust the system?
But some of my Clients use windows and were just "forced" to upgrade their hardware and use Windows 11.
* Go ballroom dancing. * Go square dancing. * Go to the library and read their historical non-fiction primary sources (letters and journals). * Go to church (I'm serious, even if you are an atheist). * Go roller skating at a rink. * Go ice skating. * Go paint balling. * Go to a water park. * Go to your HOA/City/County board/commissioners meetings. * Go to your state legislature meetings. * Go to a volunteer firefighters informational meeting. * Go to a plant/flower (orchid/African violate) growers club. * Go to a sewing club. * Go to a fishing class or just fish. * Go to a hunting/gun class or just hunt/shoot.
You tag entries in your keepass DB with "safe-print", then point the tool to the db file, unlock it, then it generates a printout to put in your safe.
They do NOT encurage using Paulo Freire's "methods".
If you want an opportunity in this space, it isn't actually encrypted emails, but possibly standardizing and streamlining such "message pointers" and address endpoint verification.
2. I think the federal government executive branch should be able to control itself and inspect itself.
The president should not be able to declare war without an act of Congress. The constitution grants the power to make law to congress, but then congress has enacted many laws which create agencies under the executive branch, which in turns empowers the executive branch.
So I agree that Congress should make/repeal laws that reduce the size of the executive branch so that only necessary powers are entrusted to the executive branch.
However, until that day comes, the separation of powers is the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. Within the executive, inward looking (not external like killing people), yeah, the president and his appointed cabinet should have control. Without that control, you are defining an unaccountable form of government.
The belief consists of two parts:
1. That truth is socially constructed thus when we see bad things, it means society created these bad things.
2. In order to determine what parts of society to cut-out to make society better, so bad things stop happening, use a critical theory to determine who should be removed from society so it can be more equitable (usually the stand in for good.
Woke normally holds that goodness is when results are equal, and if they are not equal, they have license to adjust them to equal (This is the core argument of Marxism, though woke could be said to be identity or social Marxism rather then just the economic Marxism presented, though in practice class identity was present from the start as well and expanded in practice under Mao).
This is almost universally true. We need morals/ideals, but they must be grounded in reality, in what is. If we just trudge along, we loose any vision for the future that could be better. If we just have idealism when we try to make things better, things usually get worse.
I'm not a constructivist (and definitely not a critical constructivist); I believe reality is knowable and consequential.
So have ideals; ground them in reality.
https://github.com/kardianos/safekeysheet
It could be modified to also print out the otp as well if stored.
That being said, it looks like jj pragmatically addresses many of the issues with git.
But also, these little things aren't useful. But having been on the other side of the table, there are too many candidates you can't do basic programming, debugging, or logical thinking. So you dial it back, where do these people fall down? Often, they fall down at elementary questions like these "nano questions" and people who can do all these, these "nano questions" always known. They are proxy questions that act with a high degree of correlation to the people who I want.