Most of current tools in the market focus on projects rather than teams. My believe is that there is a need for both.
To-do app serves as logic starting point for this, kind of a core.
501 karma · joined December 9, 2009
Most of current tools in the market focus on projects rather than teams. My believe is that there is a need for both.
To-do app serves as logic starting point for this, kind of a core.
On a related noted - some in-app "hints" that explains this would be great. Something I should really add ...
About multiple fields per to-do - that's actually against one of the key principles - keep it simple, be minimalist. It keeps your to-do list focused, not overloaded with too much noise and secondary information.
Done button - you can use "Space" shortcut key for that.
About web UI - there are a lot of web-based to-do list out there, so it's not really a big differentiator. For me, being a heavy user, web based to-dos didn't work very well and that was one of the main reasons I built Codo. Nevertheless I can see how it adds some value.
Mobile client - this one I'm also lacking most of all, so will do something about it sooner than later.
Although it's probably one of the symptoms, it's not the most important one.
They don't share because of their EGOS.
sure you can customize it every imaginable way, still it's conservative and quite static chair, and it wasn't that comfortable for really long hacking sessions
I'm sure Google has developed some serious technology to address this while building Wave. Wondering if some of it come to Google AppEngine anytime soon?