When people say they don't write the code, they mean they don't type it, but if there are not vibe coding garbage they are still watching what the agent outputs, and redirects it when it goes wrong. Instead of fixing the code manually they prompt the LLM.
IMHO no one know what the heck is going to happen. Probably will have to adapt to the situation as needed... In other words, it's too hard to predict to come up with a plan ahead of time?
Works great in other countries with high unemployment. That's exactly what happens! People elect a person who says they are going to change everything to fix it and they never get around to it for some reason :)
I only switched tab/windows once (to input the question). So I'm not sure how severely you'd want to rate that.
The webcam doing eye tracking might help if the person isn't good a typing and can copy one side without checking if the other is okay...
Something that I always wonder with each blog post comparing different types of prompt engineering is did they run it once, or multiple times? LLMs are not consistent for the same task. I imagine they realize this of course, but I never get enough details of the testing methodology.
I pulled up a 2nd browser next to your site. I typed the prompt into Gemini, and manually typed what Gemini said and removed em dashes as I typed. It said it was 100% genuine.
That's just silly. People are allowed to make grandiose claims and no one is allowed to question their statements? Anyone who is curious about these statements just "hates AI"?
Considering this is barely any code at all I imagine it doesn't provide anywhere near the feature set other web frameworks do. Also there are no tests. How do you know it even works properly? Why would I trust that it works properly?