1,596 karma · joined April 4, 2017
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jrimbault; my proof: https://keybase.io/jrimbault/sigs/YStRMnahTqv-NqG4y2N0krmu7X--H4cModprRVH05J8 ]
Very weird reasoning. Without AlphaGo, AlphaZero, there's probably no GPT ? Each were a stepping stone weren't they?
- https://www.ajinomoto.com/innovation/our_innovation/buildupf...
Looking at this resolved most of my issues about discoverability.
I have done this 3 seconds gesture, and variations of it, my whole life basically, and never noticed I was throwing the glass from one hand to the other without any visual feedback.
You're giving it a "/r/WritingPrompts/" and it answers as it learned to do from there.
I know barely anything about it but it seems some people are interested and excited about protein engineering powered by neural networks.
CppCon 2017: Matt Kulukundis “Designing a Fast, Efficient, Cache-friendly Hash Table, Step by Step” : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncHmEUmJZf4
[0]: https://lexi-lambda.github.io/blog/2019/11/05/parse-don-t-va...
[1]: all previous threads https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=lexi-lambda.github.io
It's a Rust compile time Sudoku solver. It solves the almost complete puzzle, not the "real" puzzle.
[0]: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&editi...
https://groups.google.com/g/golang-dev/c/r4rdPdsH1Fg/m/JG3Wl...
> I can think of two examples of major aesthetic shifts in Go code that seemed ugly at the time but were adopted because they simplified software engineering and now look completely natural.
https://research.swtch.com/vgo-principles
> type Duration int64
https://github.com/golang/go/blob/519c0a2323700934cbec97b75d...
> default values
That way of thinking starts from a place that is not conducive to a long term ecological healthy society.
Both. And with different constraints at different time periods.
Aside, people in the past weren't stupid and they built cities purposefully. Just like cavemen weren't stupid, they just had less _stuff_, knowledge, tools, etc.
> In any case what value does this "norm" have?
Using less fuel. Enjoying a more healthy body and mind, enjoying life. Leaving a better world for its future inhabitants.
> You would prefer to walk around a city because it's that's dense as opposed to walking around nature that's specifically set aside for this type of enjoyment?
Strawman ("because it's that dense"). I like walking in cities AND nature. Both can be true.
Also, why should nature be "set aside"? What a weird notion. Why shouldn't we have more "nature" in our cities, in fact we know it's probably better to do exactly that, for a myriad of reasons that have been scientifically researched. Why should WE "set aside" nature, as if it was somehow external to us.
I come out of the first tech interview, coding/debugging, with praises. But then comes the second, the architecture interview, and I can't for the life of me draw the architecture of anything.
I don't know how people learn to do that, I've learned to code/debug by being obsessive about it. But I don't see how that happens for system architecture.
I've never used diagrams in my day-to-day work, so when it comes up in interviews I'm always surprised.
[1]: https://www.economist.com/europe/2013/10/19/slave-labour-and...
It's invisible but it does have the "downside" that I no longer appear in search results when searching my firstname.