2,243 karma · joined April 25, 2012
Are we saying that 5 in 100 people will suck. If so think that’s an underestimate.
Practically, having no staging is such a hard concept for people to get their heads around.
It’s one more safety net gone, but it’s a good one.
Maturity of the business, team and product play a big part in this decision.
I’d never buy their general consumer stuff though, it’s stack high, sell cheap.
In times of economic downturn there’s opportunity. That’s exciting.
If not, then chances are the team will need some guardrails, that’s what agile and scrum offers. It’s a place to start.
Just because you don’t believe in having a system to break down work doesn’t mean it isn’t useful.
Personally, I’ve seen the alternative in action and it always leads to burnout.
https://www.wired.com/story/amazon-failed-to-protect-your-da...
What?
How would an increase in leisure time increase GDP?
It’d be interesting to see the actual figures before drawing a conclusion.
On one hand I can imagine if you’re spending all your time in meetings it would be frustrating, meanwhile I’ve what happens when teams don’t collaborate, it’s not a pleasant experience, it just causes tension to build up.
Done correctly comments should be redundant.
That doesn’t mean actual documentation isn’t useful, but it only captures a point in time, rather than the actual living code.