johnnyhillbilly

If you assume none of the ~30 that went to Syria joined IS, that leaves ~300 "of other potential radicals in Aarhus".

That's an enormous amount of _potential_ harm even with low tech attacks like knives in crowds.

Completely depleted economies[1], a general anti-war movement, a cold war + nuclear weapons surely mean there is no credit left for "internationalism".

1) barring the US' selective rebuilding of the West German economy after the war.

Really? What about Ireland? They call it the Celtic tiger, but it is really the Celtic leech upon the rest of Europe.

Are you seriously saying this lawyer is doing the wrong thing? Why don't you go and exercise your judgement what you think is right in your own life instead?

Shame seems to be a lost value.

Sounds like you are up against the echo chamber of the soft sciences. Logic and standards of proof are out the window. There is no point in arguing against such points of view, since who is right is predefined and the result of pseudoacademic popularity contests - not science.

Soft sciences these days are for people that want to appear as though educated, but don't want to be burdened by evidence, proofs etc. It is time to clear the fog on that matter.