194 karma · joined May 31, 2009
For example:
Start your new Ubuntu machine...
$ vagrant init precise32 http://files.vagrantup.com/precise32.box
$ vagrant up
SSH in..
$ vagrant ssh
And install tmux
$ sudo apt-get install tmux
*note: these commands are off the top of my head, please read the getting started guide for proper instructions.
The OP saved up to live working on things he loved.
I mostly save up to travel and try new things.
Some people save up to buy a shiny new red sports car.
When you are old, you are going to decide if you have lived life to the fullest.
I think everyone would be happier if Apps users could signal to Google they would like to be a 'new features beta tester'.
In short, if you can't write a simple FizzBuzz program, then you are probably not a good developer. Questions like these are good for being a quick way to separate programmers from those who cannot program at all.
But I agree - as someone who sucks at puzzles under pressure, questions like 'what's next after 111221?' seems like a totally retarded question to me.
[I'm putting my "User" hat on here.]
Lets look at two "user cases" here:
1. I'm on page 2 and I want to look at page 3. I click "More", and I get page 3 but with a few greyed out links I have already seen.
2. I'm on page 2 and I want to look at page 3. I click "More", and I get "Unknown or Expired Link". I firkdanggurbleblast and manually delete the fnid out of the URL and hit enter which takes me back to the first page, then I click on the second page, and then click on the third page, which also contain greyed out links.
Which of the above user cases do you think is preferable?
As I said previously, I'm really just trying to illustrate the difference between technical beauty and what users perceive as beauty.
Thanks for the reply, I've replied to this answer (above/below/Unknown or Expired Link).
I understand how it works technically, but I think this illustrates a classic debate between developer and user/customer.
As a developer I can see the functional beauty.
As a user, I think it sucks and I don't give a damn about "session indexes". As a user I just want to see the next page of cool links. I think most people here are 'users'. So why not just have a stateless solution? (aka just linking to ..page=2 as suggested?)
(Kidding, its a nice analogy but I think its also good to do some research on the tools you might need first or you might waste a lot of time. I once wasted a month of development time because I picked the wrong toolbox for the job).
I'm talking about a simple CRUD type APIs for quick development. Ideally it would have user sign up and simple field validation baked in.
I would suggest that one of the most important ways to protect your brand is not to be evil. I believe Microsoft failed at this (it is why I switched away from using their products). Apple is now currently failing here at an even greater degree (I currently own a Macbook and an iPhone, but I believe these will be my last Apple products).
It is one thing for a company to want the best experience for its users. But blocking musicians from their fans is not the way to go about this, no matter how small the musician or fan. You can still have a great store for the general populace, and still allow everyone else to access and share the data they want.
The data must flow.
I wish could find a good post that doesn't just say this, it really makes me get it. Any suggestions?
Edit: Thanks unoti - http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1845104 , I'm going to be reading this next http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/
1. He loved life. Really loved it. He kept active, doing the things he loved until he died. 2. He seemed to live pretty much stress free.