jimiwen

an aesthetic osmosis ! "The result of this struggle is a difference between the intention and its realization, a difference which the artist is not [aware] of." this i am not so sure... Duchamp's art coefficient = gap, good or bad, So is it possible art coefficient=0 but asthetic scale = ∞, or art coefficient= random and asthetic scale = 0 or ∞ depending on which view you take of Shannon's theory

at the moment only certain vertical trees work!!

Bayes+++ the combination of structuring the a priori and perceiving the posteriori

"The fallible human mind participates in the beauty of an infallible abstract realm that, in the view of many mathematicians, exists independently of the mental and physical worlds." Kurt Gödel

Gödel++

an aesthetic osmosis !

"The result of this struggle is a difference between the intention and its realization, a difference which the artist is not [aware] of." this i am not so sure...

Duchamp's art coefficient = gap, good or bad,

So is it possible art coefficient=0 but esthetic scale = ∞

wasnt this one of the points the defendant wasted to make?

are there any food regulation involved?

hi josaka, yeh i think the new procedures (IPR, CBM) relatively increases prior art research emphasis. Do you think high success rate has a pre-selected bias? i.e. stakeholders only apply higher confidence oppositions to the USPTO?

Although courts/ITC might not grant a stay depending on IPR, CBM etc., there have been some cases if the litigation hasnt gone too far, a stay could/have been granted in some of cases. Would this tip the scales towards the defendant slightly, given that the specific patents would be known?

In the AIA 2011, there are some new post-grant opposition procedure that speeds up and reduce the legal cost such as PGR, IPR, CBM. Although opposition application is about $30k USD plus some paper work. This is not super cheap, but it is still a lot cheaper than going through discovery and superstar trial lawyers by litigating, which would be in the millions $$.

There are plenty of bugs in a patent. Each patent examiner only has 10-20 to "examine" a patent application, many bad and "dangerous" patents get granted. I think using a hacker's approach can weed out bad patents like bugs!!

Let’s help Life360 fight back. http://venturebeat.com/2014/05/23/patent-trolls-have-come-af...