159 karma · joined July 19, 2008
http://medium.com/@voxxit
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jdelsman; my proof: https://keybase.io/jdelsman/sigs/f35PEED7rz9v1yQGUxtjLx1lFSy-fspuqRlCDjVoiEk ]
I think its convenient how the software structure is already on Gerrit (http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/), and we all use Google Apps for email, etc.
The only downside is that they don't have a version for Linux. Oh well.
However, I do agree that Ruby (and Rails) needs to get its act together. Sure, its never going to be the best, but the ease of development and deployment and (etc.) makes it very, very hard to turn down.
BTW: 25 servers to service up to 400 images per second is inaccurate. It only took them 8 asset servers to serve that amount of images. Even so, that is pretty ridiculous. I would have to say that they didn't spend time optimizing their asset servers, or anything else other than Ruby. I think it could be done better.