jdangu

Several XSS flaws were fixed quickly:

http://reflets.info/le-retour-du-mega-merdier-de-kim/

(french)

Don't tamper with my Internet please.

With dynamic languages like JS and ActionScript, their approach is to fingerprint 10 different strains of the same threat. Then the 11th strain can be generated in a few seconds with new obfuscation.

So the A/V only starts working if/when eventually a native code payload reaches the target.

The Google Safebrowsing report [1] appears fairly ambiguous though:

"Site is listed as suspicious - visiting this web site may harm your computer (...)"

"Of the 12029 pages we tested on the site over the past 90 days, 0 page(s) resulted in malicious software being downloaded and installed without user consent. The last time Google visited this site was on 2012-12-30, and suspicious content was never found on this site within the past 90 days."

[1] http://safebrowsing.clients.google.com/safebrowsing/diagnost...

By adding a component of inflation, you increase exchanges.

Let's just get rid of the cap and keep things simple.

edit: Of course from a micro-economic perspective this doesn't make sense unless it was forced onto us by a government as a de facto standard.

For the sake of comparison, here's a 1998 essay about what Microsoft was specifically doing in Win95:

http://71.6.196.237/fravia/mmstory.htm

- Converting to/from BTC will become easier

- Accepting Bitcoins as a merchant will be easier

Actually, they plan to tax all capital gains as ordinary income, most of that comes from stock/financial investments. The article doesn't mention that this was not meant to impact entrepreneurs but is merely a side effect. As I understand it, there will most likely be an exemption for this case.

Looks more like $25 then, what's the catch? :)

How does caching works? Is there any focus on security? Multiple geolocations?

I liked the TOS :) ---- Diffbot.com is made available for personal, non-commercial, and commercial purposes. Services are provided as-is, and we do not make any guarantees on the quality or performance.

Then it's a question of volume to reach higher tiers / lower costs, and/or getting enough funding to sustain low margins at launch.

Twilio has both the volume and the funding. Hopefully Plivo can differentiate through innovation.

You seem to imply that setting high prices is a dishonest practice. If you don't find enough value to justify the high cost, just move on, that might not be true for others.