396 karma · joined March 9, 2009
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jbr; my proof: https://keybase.io/jbr/sigs/ay9Ew0uq18nLLvvi_rFYnpjPdtpNgQ7Yht3tTxUA73g ]
Details at http://presencetelecare.com/careers#1226ffb63eb89022_OLE_LIN...
I'm not affiliated with them, but I know the founders are looking high and low for the right person.
> Only a single ad will be shown for each page viewed.
I hear it's a pretty sweet deal, though.
Have you thought about getting ahold of them to find out how it performs now, just for curiosity's sake?
"It was too easy for them; they were too successful raising money. If they'd had to grow the company gradually, by iterating through several versions they sold to real users, they'd have learned pretty quickly that people looked stupid riding them."
This is less an issue of funding and more an issue of their belief that they would make a "new cool"/"paradigm shift"/"disruptive tech." Although this might often be correlated with funding, I think that's because funded disruptive technologies are the ones that make waves (heh). Segway was a company that had the balls to believe that cities would change shape for them; it seems ludicrous to think that looking silly (now) would pose much of a threat to their confidence, money or not.
So instead of pg's conclusion that it was the funding that inhibited them, I suggest it's the very nature of disruptive technologies. Some of these fail and we laugh about it; others actually change the fabric of modern life.
In fact, perhaps it's because they had such a big, outrageous dream that they captured the public imagination (and possibly funding). Outrageous propositions like "technology that changes the shape of industrialized cities" are the sort of black-swan-esque gamble that VCs seem to adore. (Nicholas Taleb's extremistan / pareto principle) Not to mention that it makes a great story for the media.
As Buckwild said, best way to learn R is by messing around with it; There's in-editor help and a REPL. Download the GUI for your OS, not just the command-line tool; it has nice package management and graphical output (to a quartz window in os x).
If you're thinking of using R for plotting as well as analysis, I heartily heartily recommend the ggplot2 package. ( http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/ ) -- there's a lively google group for support and the output is far better than comparable packages (like lattice, my second favorite).
The other famous book for R isn't actually for R -- it's for S. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/ R is the open-source superset implementation of S/S-plus.
Download R and give it a shot: http://cran.r-project.org/mirrors.html
Thanks!
I've gotten a number of replies about the email invitation. I am looking into that currently (one monitor is that code, the other is HN). It's absolutely a bug if it doesn't do what you, the user, expect -- even if it's what we intended. However, this seems like a true bug, probably an overstrict email validation regex.
position: relative is now fixed on the screenshot. Sign up and learn more buttons are now clickable.