jayd16

If the test fixture ends up in the context that will push it in a certain direction.

There's no concept of 'cheating' because it is without morality. It's a lawnmower rolling down a hill.

We back-justify what it "chose" or "decided" or "learned" because we're looking backwards from the end result we, the human evaluators, stopped on.

Financially incorrect, it seems.

Well actually the planet happened to have a vast reserve of petroleum they could use for fuel to escape the gravity well. That helped a lot.

But what's your point? "Anything is possible" or something like that?

Billions of years of evolution hasn't hit on it. Seems pretty unlikely.

Async/await syntax doesn't guarantee what kind mechanism is servicing the async work. Consider a situation where you have limited threads (perhaps even only one servicing both sync and async calls).

Blocking that thread to wait for an async call would prevent the async call from completing and would be a deadlock.

As noted, you can run sync code from an async context. Even if you have a thread pool, blocking in sync has a chance to block and consume an async worker thread. That can also cause deadlocks.

They don't make it easy to wait synchronously because it's a bad idea. Making the syntax more amicable to blocking is a worse idea.

Something I've noticed is that a phone is actually usable at a stadium or concert when 3g or 4g felt essentially useless at that density.

Auto tagging the foot contact points is kinda fun. I usually just see it hand marked in the source anim.

It makes them yes-men.

I kind of feel like this topples the house of cards a bit. What else is all the visual genAI tech for besides consumer entertainment?

It will be interesting times but I don't think anyone will enjoy a plateau because it's expensive. Even replacing existing hardware is expensive now. Hardly enjoyabe.

JetBrains provides an MCP server such that agents can query the project index for things like find usages. What's different about this?

The .NET implementation also has a similar AOTCache with ReadyToRun. That's a public and old enough to have pros and cons shake out in the real world that would be worth talking about.

I'm not sure the pissing contest is really relevant, nor do I think Excelsior JET is all that common but if that is a similar system and you would like to talk about the real world impact please expand on it.

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/deploying/read...

To be generous, it seems like the most natural way to phrase what happened. The non-developer punched in "should this be a database instead?" and it will say "You are right to question it! I was sloppy when .. blah blah blah blah blah"

I doubt the human went into a whole diatribe with the CLI about how the developer on the project with this many years was saying this or that but she wanted Claude to second guess them.

It's just saying "ah yeah, that went through without issue."

Do you understand why the iPad is used? This is both in one.

They're talking about verification. Was there a collision or not compared to is this story good.

Probably just luck seeing at the wheel intersects the frame and the penguin's legs are caught in the chain.

The repo should define rules for the repo, no? You have to hope other contributors have a similar local gitignore?

It's the only way to do certain things but the devx is burdensome. It might be easy enough to do a thing but the major issue is that you have to constantly fight wonky behavior when working in a team.

If someone adds a new submodule, you need to know to pull it or at least init it. You need to know the code is in a submodule and treat it differently, complicating integration procedures.

It certainly does not behave the same in that you certainly can't ignore whether it exists once it's set up.

It can be pretty helpful to think of human function in chemical terms. Its at least unhelpful to deny it.

> _determining_ the next token based on a prediction

Also known as predicting.

The trick is to destabilize their democracies first.

So is the US not democratic enough, not rich enough or not free market enough?

For a company like Sony, you would say they failed to meet demand.

Under Apple's reality distortion you instead must say that they were surprised by the demand.

How do you handle I/O type exceptions with contracts?

Those are not "Hollywood movies" but Detective Pikachu might count.

> For every one good movie or show you get ten bad ones.

Executive: So what you're telling me is I only need to make 11 movies to per hit.

Reminds me of the Rick and Morty pilot.

"They're just robots, Morty!"

*Blood splurt

"They're not robots, Rick!"

"I mean they're bureaucrats, Morty. I don't respect them."

Just get a laptop?

Lip service is certainly there but it's not like we have unions or really anything that isn't just marketing.

Again, we have the technology but it's not how things are done, usually.

What do you run like that day to day?