If that's the case, then why has no one been prosecuted on those grounds?
16,566 karma · joined February 17, 2013
If that's the case, then why has no one been prosecuted on those grounds?
Just visit the link I posted, this will take you two seconds to verify.
>> "The officers attempted to disarm the suspect but the armed suspect violently resisted. More details on the armed struggle are forthcoming."
You've misread your link. The "violently resisted" quote is from a tweet by DHS, not local police: https://xcancel.com/DHSgov/status/2015115351797780500
A fuller quote:
> To stop an individual for brief questioning about immigration status, the Government must have reasonable suspicion that the individual is illegally present in the United States ... Reasonable suspicion is a lesser requirement than probable cause and "considerably short" of the preponderance of the evidence standard ... Whether an officer has reasonable suspicion depends on the totality of the circumstances ... Here, those circumstances include: that there is an extremely high number and percentage of illegal immigrants in the Los Angeles area; that those individuals tend to gather in certain locations to seek daily work; that those individuals often work in certain kinds of jobs, such as day labor, landscaping, agriculture, and construction, that do not require paperwork and are therefore especially attractive to illegal immigrants; and that many of those illegally in the Los Angeles area come from Mexico or Central America and do not speak much English. To be clear, apparent ethnicity alone cannot furnish reasonable suspicion; under this Court's case law regarding immigration stops, however, it can be a "relevant factor" when considered along with other salient factors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kavanaugh_stop?wprov=sfti1#Sup...
The issue with plea bargains is not that guilty people are given leniency for remorse; it is that they are used to coerce innocent people into confessing to a crime they did not commit.
[1] https://www.npr.org/2023/02/22/1158356619/plea-bargains-crim...
<div> and <span> are semantically neutral, so I'm not sure what SEO and accessibility challenges custom elements would introduce?
> Bags seems to me to be offering crypto-airdrop-pump-and-dumps-as-a-service, where niche celebrities can turn their status as respected community figures into cold hard cash. The people who pay into this are either taken in by the pretense that they’re sponsoring open-source work (in a way orders of magnitude less efficient than just donating money directly), or by the hope that they’re going to win big when the coin goes “to the moon” (which effectively never happens).
Honestly, I think the first category is somewhere between "microscopic" and "nonexistent", but most people in the second category will end up holding the bag when this thing inevitably collapses.
If (for instance) my content changes often and I always want people to see an up-to-date version, the second option is clearly worse for me!
IMO the right approach is just to parse everything into a known type at the point of ingress, and from there you can just deal with your language's native data structures.
e.g. how do you think a browser will interpret this markup?
<div />
<img />
A lot of people think it ends up like this (especially because JSX works this way): <div></div>
<img>
but it's actually equal to this: <div>
<img>
</div>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Reference/...
Looks like the only JavaScript running on the client is for installing the service worker and some Cloudflare tracking junk.